Skip to main content
Download PDF

Population based allele frequencies of disease associated polymorphisms in the Personalized Medicine Research Project

BMC Genetics volume 11, Article number: 51 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of knowledge regarding the frequency of disease associated polymorphisms in populations and population attributable risk for many populations remains unknown. Factors that could affect the association of the allele with disease, either positively or negatively, such as race, ethnicity, and gender, may not be possible to determine without population based allele frequencies.

Here we used a panel of 51 polymorphisms previously associated with at least one disease and determined the allele frequencies within the entire Personalized Medicine Research Project population based cohort. We compared these allele frequencies to those in dbSNP and other data sources stratified by race. Differences in allele frequencies between self reported race, region of origin, and sex were determined.

Results

There were 19544 individuals who self reported a single racial category, 19027 or (97.4%) self reported white Caucasian, and 11205 (57.3%) individuals were female. Of the 11,208 (57%) individuals with an identifiable region of origin 8337 or (74.4%) were German.

41 polymorphisms were significantly different between self reported race at the 0.05 level. Stratification of our Caucasian population by self reported region of origin revealed 19 polymorphisms that were significantly different (p = 0.05) between individuals of different origins. Further stratification of the population by gender revealed few significant differences in allele frequencies between the genders.

Conclusions

This represents one of the largest population based allele frequency studies to date. Stratification by self reported race and region of origin revealed wide differences in allele frequencies not only by race but also by region of origin within a single racial group. We report allele frequencies for our Asian/Hmong and American Indian populations; these two minority groups are not typically selected for population allele frequency detection. Population wide allele frequencies are important for the design and implementation of studies and for determining the relevance of a disease associated polymorphism for a given population.

Background

One of the challenges for translating disease associated polymorphisms into use is the lack of knowledge regarding the frequency of the polymorphism in the targeted population. Without this information, population attributable risk remains unknown. In addition, factors that could affect the association of the allele with disease, either positively or negatively, such as ethnicity and gender, may not be possible to determine without population based allele frequencies. There are a number of reasons that these frequencies have yet to be determined. Disease associations whether completed through candidate gene studies or genome wide studies are determined using case control studies that classify affected and unaffected individuals but are not necessarily representative of a population and may need correction for population stratification [1–5]. Another reason that many polymorphisms lack population allele frequencies is cost; without a clear necessity to genotype a large diverse population funding for such studies is scarce [6, 7]. Finally, with the creation of large population wide biorepositories still in its infancy there has been a lack of samples for genotyping [8–11].

In the past, geneticists have relied on a small population of well characterized reference samples to estimate allele frequency in a population [12–15]. These samples include the HapMap collection of individuals with different ethnicities that has been anonomized and immortalized by Coriell [13, 14]. These populations form the population allele frequencies most often used in dbSNP [15] and a subset of these samples are also used for population allele frequencies on the Cancer500 website [12]. While these population samples are a valuable resource, they were not collected to be representative of a population and are often made up of related individuals. Even with the advent of the 1000 genomes project [16], there will still be a relatively few samples of any ethnic background to determine population allele frequencies with any certainty. This lack of a representative population distribution may not lead to representative population allele frequencies [2, 3, 5, 8, 1]. Ethnicities, such as Hispanic, are not well represented within the dbSNP database with often less than 100 individuals genotyped to determine population allele frequencies. Other backgrounds such as Native American may be missing from dbSNP all together [15].

One of the most widely used population samples the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) Human Diversity Panel, has been successful for determining large trends in human diversity and population structure [17–21], however even with the Caucasian population available from this Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH) collection and other collections, there are too few individuals to determine allelic variation within an ethnic population. Recent studies have shown that even within the Central European population the country of origin can have a great impact on allele frequencies with clearly seen variation between countries and even within a country [22–24][Feder, 2008 #87;Hannelius, 2008 #107]. This creates an even more challenging problem when attempting to use these generalized allele frequencies in a given population to estimate the burden disease associated polymorphisms have on disease within a population [20, 21]. Current genome wide association studies (GWAS) control for this by stratifying the individuals by ethnicity and country of origin but because of their case-control nature these studies are less informative regarding allele frequencies for an entire population group [2, 3, 5, 8, 1].

One method of determining population wide allele frequencies is to genotype entire biorepositories regardless of case or control status. There are several repositories that are population based, including NHANES III [25], the UK biobank [11], the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation Personalized Medicine Research Project [26], the Kaiser Permanente Research Program on Genes Environment and Health [8], and the Vanderbilt Databank Resource [10]. These biorepositories offer a broad cross sectional population available for genotyping and will be a valuable resource as more genotypes become publically available from all of these resources.

Here we used a panel of polymorphisms previously associated with disease and used as quality control markers in the PMRP population [27] to determine the allele frequencies within the entire Personalized Medicine Research Project population based cohort (Additional File 1). These allele frequencies found in our population were then compared to the frequencies found in dbSNP and other data bases stratified by race, with some of these allele frequencies varying over 10% from the reported allele frequencies. Differences in allele frequencies between self reported ethnicities within our population and differences between sexes were determined as well.

Results

Population Characteristics

Demographic characteristics for the population are presented in Table 1. There were 19544 individuals who self reported a single racial category, of these individuals the vast majority (19027 or 97.4%) self reported white Caucasian. Of individuals who selected ancestral origin, 11,208 (57%) selected either a single ancestral origin or two ancestral origins that were grouped together for our analysis (ex. Norwegian and Swedish). Of the individuals in the analysis the majority self reported German origin (8337 or 74.4%). Females outnumbered males in our sample with 11205 (57.3%) individuals with confirmed female sex.

Table 1 Population demographics for individuals genotyped within the PMRP cohort
Full size table

Population allele frequencies

As expected our population allele frequencies were significantly different for different self reported races. Allele frequencies stratified by race are reported in Table 2. Of the 51 polymorphisms tested 41 were significantly different between self reported race at the 0.05 level with 35 polymorphisms significantly different with p values of < 0.0001 (Table 2). Of these polymorphisms, 13 exhibited a minor allele frequency of over 50% within a racial category although the limited size of the non-Caucasian groups in this study creates a large amount of uncertainty regarding the actual allele frequencies in these racially stratified populations (Figure 1). For alleles with greater than a 2% minor allele frequency, only two polymorphisms deviated from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.01), rs4680 in the COMT gene in Black/African American individuals and rs1800588 in the LIPC gene in individuals self reported as Hispanic.

Table 2 Population allele frequencies stratified by self reported race
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Polymorphisms with major and minor alleles that vary with race. Minor allele frequency for the total population and the same allele for each racial group, with 95% confidence intervals.

Full size image

We compared the allele frequencies of our population with two previously published population allele frequencies, the CLUE II population [28] and the NHANES III population [29] as well as comparing our allele frequencies to those of dbSNP [15]and Cancer500 [28] allele frequencies. There were three polymorphisms assayed in all four populations, and when compared, our allele frequencies varied little from previously published population allele frequencies (Figure 2). Our Caucasian allele frequencies were within 2% of the NHANES III [29] and CLUE II [28] allele frequencies and our African American and Hispanic allele frequencies we were within 5% of these previously reported populations. In contrast, the allele frequencies reported here showed more variability when compared to reported allele frequencies in dbSNP [15]. When we compared all of the allele frequencies with those reported in the dbSNP [15] and Cancer500 [12] websites several polymorphisms differed by more than 10%. (Additional File 2). Unfortunately our American Indian population could not be compared as this is not one of the populations with widely reported allele frequencies.

Figure 2
figure 2

Minor allele frequencies of 3 polymorphisms tested in different National populations stratified by race. Comparison populations include NHANES III, CLUE II, PMRP, and dbSNP. A. Caucasian population B. African American Population C. Hispanic Population. Minor allele frequencies include 95% confidence intervals for the population minor allele frequency.

Full size image

Allele frequencies by self reported region of ancestry

There is mounting evidence that further population stratifications may be necessary as even within a racial group there can be significant differences among people of different ancestral origin. To investigate this, we stratified our Caucasian population by self reported region of origin to determine if there were differences in allele frequencies between individuals. 11,205 (57%) individuals could be categorized by a region of origin. Using this population, there were 19 polymorphisms that were significantly different (p = 0.05) between individuals of different origins (Table 3). Of these 5 (rs231775, rs6280, rs351855, rs601338, and rs429358) were significantly different with a p value of 0.0001 or less. Interestingly, the allele frequencies of some of the ethnic groups fell outside the 95% confidence interval of the total Caucasian MAF particularly the Eastern European ethnicity (Figure 3, Table 3).

Table 3 Population Caucasian allele frequencies stratified by self reported region of ancestry
Full size table
Figure 3
figure 3

Minor allele frequencies that vary significantly by region of origin. Minor allele frequency for the Caucasian population and the same allele for each region of origin, with 95% confidence intervals.

Full size image

Allele frequencies by gender

Further stratification of the population by gender revealed few significant differences in allele frequencies between the genders. Only three polymorphisms were different in the total population p < 0.05 rs7121 (GNAS), rs1801253 (ADRB1) and rs1042714 (ADRB2). After stratification by racial group, these three polymorphisms were associated with gender differences in the white racial group. Three different polymorphisms exhibited gender differences in black individuals. Hispanic genders were different in two polymorphisms. Among the American Indian population 5 polymorphisms were different between genders and the Asian/Hmong population exhibited the greatest number of polymorphisms with gender differences with 7 polymorphisms. (Additional File 3).

Discussion

This study determined the allele frequencies of 51 polymorphisms, previously associated with at least one disease state, in a large rural population. This represents one of the largest population based allele frequency studies to date. Stratification by self reported race and region of origin revealed wide differences in allele frequencies not only by race but also by region of origin within a single racial group. Here we report allele frequencies for our Asian/Hmong and American Indian populations. These two minority groups are not typically selected for population allele frequency detection. Stratification of our Caucasian population by region of origin revealed significantly different allele frequencies within a single racial group. As we move from gene disease discovery to the application of genetic knowledge, the true population wide allele frequencies become more important for the design and implementation of studies and for determining the relevance of a disease associated polymorphism for a given population.

Several recent studies have reported population wide allele frequencies; our study complements these previously published studies and contributes new information. The two largest US population allele frequency studies NHANES III [29]and CLUE II [28] also chose to report allele frequencies for polymorphisms associated with disease. The NHANES III study published allele frequencies from a nationally representative cohort for 91 polymorphisms previously associated with disease [29]; our study included 7 of these polymorphisms. The CLUE II population was genotyped for 49 polymorphisms in inflammatory genes [28], of which we also report allele frequencies for 4 of these polymorphisms. We chose to compare allele frequencies for the 3 polymorphisms all studies had in common. Our reported allele frequencies were very similar with 2 polymorphisms varying less than 1% between the studies, particularly when comparing the Caucasian population. This similarity in allele frequencies is contrasted with the dbSNP allele frequencies [15] which we varied from by over 10% for a number of polymorphisms. This highlights the continued need for large population based genotyping efforts to determine allele frequencies of disease associated polymorphisms.

Beyond agreeing with previously published population allele frequencies, this study reports allele frequencies for 43 polymorphisms not genotyped in either the NHANES III [29] or CLUE II populations [28]. The additional polymorphisms included alleles that have been associated with a number of different diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes [27] and will contribute to our understanding of disease risk. We also report initial population allele frequencies for two additional minority groups that have importance for our population; the Asian/Hmong and American Indian populations. However our minority allele frequencies have a high degree of uncertainty given the small number of individuals within the racial categories (50 African Americans) and several alleles have zero in at least one homozygote category. Racial category was self reported by an individual and admixtures were not determined, a single racial group was chosen by the individual.

As expected, our minority population allele frequencies were significantly different from the Caucasian allele frequencies for the majority (79%) of the tested polymorphisms, with 25% of the tested polymorphisms switching major and minor alleles between races. These differences will need to be considered when determining TAG and causal variants for disease. As an example, one of the IL6 polymorphisms tested here, rs1800796, has had both the C and G allele associated with osteoporosis depending on the race of the individual [28, 29]. In Asians and Caucasians the minor allele is reversed creating complexity for determining the causal variant [30, 31]. The IL1 B polymorphism (rs16944) exhibits different allele frequencies between races as well and the same allele has been shown in meta-analysis to be protective for gastric cancer in Asians and a risk factor for Caucasians [32–34]. Wide differences in allele frequencies may also contribute to differences in disease prevalence between racial groups. For instance the cystic fibrosis has large racial disparities [35] and as expected we found large differences in the CFTR gene (rs213950) among different racial groups in our population.

Here, we also began to investigate further substructure of our population within a single racial category. Because of the low number of minority racial groups in our population we chose to investigate potential substructure within only our Caucasian population. Using self reported region of ancestry, we found that 37% of the tested polymorphisms were significantly different between individuals reporting different regions of ancestry. Recent substructure analysis of Icelandic [23], Swedish[24, 36], and Ashkenazi Jewish populations [22, 37] determined that substructure was present even in these seemingly homogenous populations and that the substructure has implications for disease risk [2–5, 22–24, 36]. This study is one of the largest US studies to stratify a population by region of origin and demonstrates the large heterogeneity of the population even within a single racial group. These differences in allele frequencies may need to be considered when designing association studies in the future. One weakness of our analysis is the inability to categorize almost half (43%) of our Caucasian population into a single region of origin, because of our inability to determine the admixture given the self reported nature of the questionnaire and our limited genotyping. We are currently examining the more than 4000 individuals with whole genome scans completed to determine the ethnicities and regions of origin with greater accuracy.

Stratification of the population by sex revealed few differences in allele frequency within our population. This is similar to previously reported sex stratifications of large populations. The three genes that exhibited sex differences in our population (GNAS, ADRB1 and ADRB2) have also demonstrated gene-gender interactions in other studies. Interestingly, ADRB1 and ADRB2 alleles are associated with differential gender responses in blood pressure [38], and in rats these genes interact with sex hormones in a differential manner [39]. The GNAS gene was associated with different responses to hip arthroplasty [40]. While allele frequency differences between the sexes may not be frequent when they occur this may be an indicator of potential gene-gender interactions for future research.

Conclusions

Using a panel of polymorphisms originally designed to uniquely identify individuals within our biorepository we were able to construct population allele frequencies for the PMRP population. In doing so, we have highlighted the need to consider population substructure beyond race using a large Caucasian population. Stratification of the population may lead to increased study power for future association studies. The genotyping data is available to investigators using the PMRP resource both for identification purposes and as a resource for investigating gene disease interactions.

Methods

Study population and questionnaire

The Personalized Medicine Research Project is a population based cohort of approximately 20,000 individuals ages 18 and up residing within one of 19 zip codes surrounding Marshfield Wisconsin, USA, who have agreed to provide DNA, serum, and plasma samples to be linked with a dynamic medical record for research [26]. Individuals are eligible to participate in the project if they have had care within the Marshfield Clinic Healthcare System within the 3 years prior to enrolment in PMRP. The majority of recruitment was accomplished in the first 18 months of enrolment beginning in September of 2002. At enrolment each individual was asked to complete a brief questionnaire which included questions regarding self reported racial affiliations and self reported ancestry using the US census questions, as well as occupational and environmental exposure questions. The enrolment questionnaire is available on the PMRP website [41] and the resulting summary statistics for our population has been published elsewhere [26].

The racial, ethnic and sex distribution of this cohort has been described previously. Briefly, the current cohort is over 98% Caucasian and 57.44% are females, with a mean age of 47.5 at enrolment [26]. For this study, 19544 individuals who self reported a single racial category were examined to determine allele frequencies. Individuals were allowed to select more than one ancestral origin. For this study individuals were grouped into four regions of ancestral origins: England or Ireland, Norway or Sweden, Czech Republic or Poland, and Germany. Individuals who selected two disparate regions were excluded from our ancestral analysis due to our inability to determine admixture percentages. However, individuals who selected multiple countries of origin within the same region were included in the analysis. (As an example, an individual selecting ancestral origin from both Norway and Sweden would be used in the analysis but an individual selecting Ireland and Germany would be excluded).

Informed consent was obtained upon enrolment in PMRP and this study was approved by the Marshfield Clinic Human Subjects Protection Institutional Review Board.

Genotyping

The entire population was genotyped with 2 multiplex panels for a total of 52 alleles, including a sex marker, using the proprietary Sequenom® platform (Additional File 1). An initial panel of 36 alleles was genotyped to serve as a quality control and assurance panel. Each allele in the panel was previously associated with at least one disease and was reported to have at least a 20% minor allele frequency in Caucasians[27]. In addition, a separate panel of 15 alleles each with at least one association with disease in Caucasian populations and with no restriction on allele frequency was also genotyped in the entire cohort. Only individuals who achieved an 80% or greater call rate were used in the study. In addition, each polymorphism was required to achieve at least an 80% call rate. Individual genotypes were decided via a mixture of automated calls from Typer 3.4 ®[42] and manual calls; manual calls were checked by multiple individuals to assure agreement with the genotype assessment. Each multiplexed plate contained 4 water controls and 6 CEPH controls with 2 duplicate samples to ensure plate to plate accuracy. 8 individuals were duplicated blindly within the genotyping plates and all previous allele calls were compared to the study allele calls to ensure consistency within the cohort. In addition over 4,000 individuals in the cohort have been independently assayed using the Illumina 660 whole genome chip [43]. Discrepancies between genotyping were resolved with sequencing.

Statistical Analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was determined and polymorphisms were said to be out of equilibrium if the expected and observed allele frequency were outside of the 99% Confidence interval 1 degree of freedom using a χ2 test. Allele frequencies were compared to reported allele frequencies both as a summary and for self reported racial group. Differences in allele frequencies between self reported racial, ethnic groups were determined using chi-squared analysis and the 95% binomial confidence limits were reported. Differences between the sexes were determined using chi-squared analysis. Differences were reported as significant if P < 0.05.

References

  1. Galvan A, Ioannidis JP, Dragani TA: Beyond genome-wide association studies: genetic heterogeneity and individual predisposition to cancer. Trends Genet. 2010, 26 (3): 132-141. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.008.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dadd T, Weale ME, Lewis CM: A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2009, 33 (4): 290-298. 10.1002/gepi.20379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang K: Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2009, 33 (7): 637-645. 10.1002/gepi.20415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan W, Liang L, Boehnke M, Abecasis GR: Genotype-based matching to correct for population stratification in large-scale case-control genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2009, 33 (6): 508-517. 10.1002/gepi.20403.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yesupriya A, Evangelou E, Kavvoura FK, Patsopoulos NA, Clyne M, Walsh MC, Lin BK, Yu W, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP, et al: Reporting of human genome epidemiology (HuGE) association studies: an empirical assessment. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8: 31-10.1186/1471-2288-8-31.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pahl R, Schafer H, Muller HH: Optimal multistage designs--a general framework for efficient genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics. 2009, 10 (2): 297-309. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sale MM, Mychaleckyj JC, Chen WM: Planning and executing a genome wide association study (GWAS). Methods Mol Biol. 2009, 590: 403-418. full_text.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaiser Permanente Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health (RPGEH). [http://www.dor.kaiser.org/external/DORExternal/rpgeh/index.aspx?ekmensel=194f64c3_47_48_btnlink]

  9. Koontz JI, Haithcock D, Cumbea V, Waldron A, Stricker K, Hughes A, Nilsson K, Sun A, Piccini JP, Kraus WE, et al: Rationale and design of the Duke Electrophysiology Genetic and Genomic Studies (EPGEN) biorepository. Am Heart J. 2009, 158 (5): 719-725. 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pulley JM, Brace MM, Bernard GR, Masys DR: Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008, 9 (1): 55-65. 10.1007/s10561-007-9051-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuille M, Dixon K, Platt A, Pullum S, Lewis D, Hall A, Ollier W: The UK DNA banking network: a "fair access" biobank. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009,

    Google Scholar 

  12. Packer BR, Yeager M, Burdett L, Welch R, Beerman M, Qi L, Sicotte H, Staats B, Acharya M, Crenshaw A: SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation, assay development, and frequency analysis for genetic variation in candidate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, D617-621. 10.1093/nar/gkj151. 34 Database

  13. Thorisson GA, Smith AV, Krishnan L, Stein LD: The International HapMap Project Web site. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (11): 1592-1593. 10.1101/gr.4413105.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003, 426 (6968): 789-796. 10.1038/nature02168.

  15. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K: dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29 (1): 308-311. 10.1093/nar/29.1.308.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuehn BM: 1000 Genomes Project promises closer look at variation in human genome. JAMA. 2008, 300 (23): 2715-10.1001/jama.2008.823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cann HM, de Toma C, Cazes L, Legrand MF, Morel V, Piouffre L, Bodmer J, Bodmer WF, Bonne-Tamir B, Cambon-Thomsen A, et al: A human genome diversity cell line panel. Science. 2002, 296 (5566): 261-262. 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, Cann HM, Kidd KK, Zhivotovsky LA, Feldman MW: Genetic structure of human populations. Science. 2002, 298 (5602): 2381-2385. 10.1126/science.1078311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cavalli-Sforza LL: The Human Genome Diversity Project: past, present and future. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6 (4): 333-340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Serre D, Montpetit A, Pare G, Engert JC, Yusuf S, Keavney B, Hudson TJ, Anand S: Correction of population stratification in large multi-ethnic association studies. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (1): e1382-10.1371/journal.pone.0001382.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Myles S, Davison D, Barrett J, Stoneking M, Timpson N: Worldwide population differentiation at disease-associated SNPs. BMC Med Genomics. 2008, 1: 22-10.1186/1755-8794-1-22.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Feder J, Ovadia O, Glaser B, Mishmar D: Ashkenazi Jewish mtDNA haplogroup distribution varies among distinct subpopulations: lessons of population substructure in a closed group. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007, 15 (4): 498-500. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Price AL, Helgason A, Palsson S, Stefansson H, St Clair D, Andreassen OA, Reich D, Kong A, Stefansson K: The impact of divergence time on the nature of population structure: an example from Iceland. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5 (6): e1000505-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000505.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McEvoy BP, Montgomery GW, McRae AF, Ripatti S, Perola M, Spector TD, Cherkas L, Ahmadi KR, Boomsma D, Willemsen G, et al: Geographical structure and differential natural selection among North European populations. Genome Res. 2009, 19 (5): 804-814. 10.1101/gr.083394.108.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-94 Series 1: programs and collection procedures. Vital Health Stat 1. 1994, 1-407. 32

  26. McCarty CA, Wilke RA, Giampietro PF, Wesbrook SD, Caldwell MD: Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP): Design, methods and recruitment for a large population-based biobank. Personalized Med. 2005, 2 (1): 49-79. 10.1517/17410541.2.1.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cross DS, Ivacic LC, McCarty CA: Development of a fingerprinting panel using medically relevant polymorphisms. BMC Med Genomics. 2009, 2: 17-10.1186/1755-8794-2-17.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang HY, Thuita L, Strickland P, Hoffman SC, Comstock GW, Helzlsouer KJ: Frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes regulating inflammatory responses in a community-based population. BMC Genet. 2007, 8: 7-10.1186/1471-2156-8-7.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang MH, Lindegren ML, Butler MA, Chanock SJ, Dowling NF, Gallagher M, Moonesinghe R, Moore CA, Ned RM, Reichler MR, et al: Prevalence in the United States of selected candidate gene variants: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1991-1994. Am J Epidemiol. 2009, 169 (1): 54-66. 10.1093/aje/kwn286.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chung HW, Seo JS, Hur SE, Kim HL, Kim JY, Jung JH, Kim LH, Park BL, Shin HD: Association of interleukin-6 promoter variant with bone mineral density in pre-menopausal women. J Hum Genet. 2003, 48 (5): 243-248. 10.1007/s10038-003-0020-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Giampietro PF, McCarty C, Mukesh B, McKiernan F, Wilson D, Shuldiner A, Liu J, LeVasseur J, Ivacic L, Kitchner T, et al: The role of cigarette smoking and statins in the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a pilot study utilizing the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Cohort. Osteoporos Int. 2010, 21 (3): 467-477. 10.1007/s00198-009-0981-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Camargo MC, Mera R, Correa P, Peek RM, Piazuelo MB, Sicinschi L, Schneider BG, Zabaleta J, Fontham ET, Goodman KJ, et al: IL1B polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007, 16 (3): 635-10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0925. author reply 635-636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vincenzi B, Patti G, Galluzzo S, Pantano F, Venditti O, Santini D, Ruzzo A, Schiavon G, Caraglia M, Marra M, et al: Interleukin 1beta-511T gene (IL1beta) polymorphism is correlated with gastric cancer in the Caucasian population: results from a meta-analysis. Oncol Rep. 2008, 20 (5): 1213-1220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Loh M, Koh KX, Yeo BH, Song CM, Chia KS, Zhu F, Yeoh KG, Hill J, Iacopetta B, Soong R: Meta-analysis of genetic polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk: variability in associations according to race. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (14): 2562-2568. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharp JK, Rock MJ: Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008, 35 (3): 107-115. 10.1007/s12016-008-8082-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hannelius U, Salmela E, Lappalainen T, Guillot G, Lindgren CM, von Dobeln U, Lahermo P, Kere J: Population substructure in Finland and Sweden revealed by the use of spatial coordinates and a small number of unlinked autosomal SNPs. BMC Genet. 2008, 9: 54-10.1186/1471-2156-9-54.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Feder J, Blech I, Ovadia O, Amar S, Wainstein J, Raz I, Dadon S, Arking DE, Glaser B, Mishmar D: Differences in mtDNA haplogroup distribution among 3 Jewish populations alter susceptibility to T2DM complications. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 198-10.1186/1471-2164-9-198.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rana BK, Insel PA, Payne SH, Abel K, Beutler E, Ziegler MG, Schork NJ, O'Connor DT: Population-based sample reveals gene-gender interactions in blood pressure in White Americans. Hypertension. 2007, 49 (1): 96-106. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000252029.35106.67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Golden KL, Marsh JD, Jiang Y: Testosterone regulates mRNA levels of calcium regulatory proteins in cardiac myocytes. Horm Metab Res. 2004, 36 (4): 197-202. 10.1055/s-2004-814445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bachmann HS, Hanenkamp S, Kornacki B, Frey UH, Bau M, Siffert W, Wedemeyer C: Gender-dependent association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with early aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2008, 26 (12): 1562-1568. 10.1002/jor.20699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Personalized Medicine Research Project. [http://www.marshfieldclinic.org/chg/pages/default.aspx?page=chg_pers_med_res_prj]

  42. Sequenom: Typer 3.4. Sequenom, 3.4

  43. The eMERGE Network. [https://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/victr/dcc/projects/acc/index.php/Main_Page]

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant 1UL1RR025011 from the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program of the National Centre for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health and grants from the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation.

We would like to acknowledge the Genetics Core Laboratory and particularly Sherri Reisner and Jennifer Meece for their tireless work to genotype 20,000 samples.

We would like to acknowledge the Personalized Medicine Research Project study coordinators who enrolled patients, collected race and ethnicity questionnaires, and continue to support the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 N. Oak Ave., Marshfield, WI, USA

    Deanna S Cross, Lynn C Ivacic, Elisha L Stefanski & Catherine A McCarty

Authors
  1. Deanna S Cross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn C Ivacic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisha L Stefanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catherine A McCarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanna S Cross.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

DC conceived of the study, participated in the design and implementation of the genotyping assays, supervised the study, created the data analysis plan, and drafted the manuscript. Has read and approved the final manuscript. LI participated in the design and implementation of the genotyping assays, performed the genotyping assays, analyzed the data for Hardy-Weinberg deviations, and created allele frequency tables for race and ethnicity. Has read and approved the final manuscript. ES performed the genotyping assays, analyzed the data for Hardy-Weinberg deviations, and created allele frequency tables for race and ethnicity. Has read and approved the final manuscript. CM participated in study conception and design, was responsible for summary data for population characteristics, participated in manuscript preparation and editing. Has read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12863_2010_798_MOESM1_ESM.DOC

Additional file 1:Description of the 51 polymorphisms genotyped for this study. Polymorphism list and description. Description of the 51 polymorphisms genotyped for this study. Word Table (DOC 80 KB)

12863_2010_798_MOESM2_ESM.DOC

Additional file 2:Allele frequencies with 10% or greater variation from allele frequencies reported in dbSNP stratified by race. Allele frequency variation from dbSNP by race. Table of allele frequencies that varied by more than 10% from previously reported allele frequencies in dbSNP stratified by self reported race. Word Table (DOC 64 KB)

12863_2010_798_MOESM3_ESM.DOC

Additional file 3:Polymorphisms with significant differences between genders when stratified by race. Allele frequency stratified by race and gender. Polymorphisms with significant differences between genders when stratified by race. Word Table (DOC 50 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, D.S., Ivacic, L.C., Stefanski, E.L. et al. Population based allele frequencies of disease associated polymorphisms in the Personalized Medicine Research Project. BMC Genet 11, 51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-51

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-51

Keywords

  • Allele Frequency
  • Population Attributable Risk
  • Ancestral Origin
  • Population Allele Frequency
  • American Indian Population

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us