Skip to main content
Download PDF

Construction and validation of a fatty acid metabolism risk signature for predicting prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

BMC Genomic Data volume 23, Article number: 85 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fatty acid metabolism has been reported to play important roles in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but there are no prognostic signatures composed of fatty acid metabolism-related genes. As the current prognostic evaluation system has limitations due to the heterogeneity of AML patients, it is necessary to develop a new signature based on fatty acid metabolism to better guide prognosis prediction and treatment selection.

Methods

We analyzed the RNA sequencing and clinical data of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Vizome cohorts. The analyses were performed with GraphPad 7, the R language and SPSS.

Results

We selected nine significant genes in the fatty acid metabolism gene set through univariate Cox analysis and the log-rank test. Then, a fatty acid metabolism signature was established based on these genes. We found that the signature was as an independent unfavourable prognostic factor and increased the precision of prediction when combined with classic factors in a nomogram. Gene Ontology (GO) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that the risk signature was closely associated with mitochondrial metabolism and that the high-risk group had an enhanced immune response.

Conclusion

The fatty acid metabolism signature is a new independent factor for predicting the clinical outcomes of AML patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by the clonal expansion of abnormally differentiated myeloid progenitor cells [1, 2]. With standard chemotherapy, AML patients have poor outcomes and high mortality rates because of relapsed disease and leukemia-related complications, especially in patients aged 60 years and older. In addition, the outcome of AML is heterogeneous with patient-related and disease-related factors [2, 3]. Currently, cytogenetic risk combined with molecular abnormalities is used as a classic risk stratification system to predict the probability of complete response (CR) and relapse, as well as overall survival (OS) according to the national recommendations [4, 5]. However, this system has limitations in patients without defined chromosomal or genetic alterations. Therefore, the development of a more accurate risk stratification system for AML is imperative to select suitable therapies and precisely predict clinical outcomes.

Metabolic reprogramming is a dynamic process accompanied by the whole process of leukemia [6,7,8]. When glucose metabolism shifts to aerobic glycolysis, AML cells enter a malignant proliferation phase, and when glucose metabolism shifts back into mitochondrial metabolism, AML cells enter a stem cell-based self-maintenance phase [9, 10]. Moreover, fatty acid metabolism also plays an important role in AML progression [11]. Specific alterations in fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and fatty acid synthesis (FAS) participate in core mitochondrial metabolic pathways influencing the fate of leukemia stem cells (LSCs), the adaptation to a specialized microenvironment, and the response to drugs. The expression of FAO enzymes including APOC2, CD36, CT2, FABP4, PHD3 and CPT1 were elevated in AML compared to normal hematopoiesis, moreover inhibition of these enzymes resulted in increased sensitivity to chemotherapy and decreased AML survival [12,13,14,15,16,17]. However, no modelled signature of fatty acid metabolism has been developed to predict the prognosis of AML patients and to further select therapeutic strategies based on fatty acid metabolism.

In this study, we established a fatty acid metabolism risk signature with significant prognostic value based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) AML database and validated it in another AML database (Vizome). The fatty acid metabolism risk signature could independently identify AML patients with poor clinical outcomes more precisely than other prognostic markers.

Results

Construction of a fatty acid metabolism signature in AML

Considering the essential role of fatty acid metabolism in AML, we sought to establish a fatty acid metabolism signature (FA risk score) for prognostication. We used patients from the TCGA AML database as the training cohort. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to explore the prognostic value of fatty acid metabolism-related genes (Supplementary Table 1). Thirty-seven genes were found to be associated with prognosis in AML (Supplementary Table 2 ). Then, we further screened the significant genes by log-rank prognostic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1A) and finally selected 9 genes (MLYCD, CYP4F2, SLC25A1, PLA2G4A, ACBD4, ACOT7, ACSF2, CBR1, and ACSL5). MLYCD and CYP4F2 were identified as protective factors with hazard ratios (HRs) < 1, whereas SLC25A1, PLA2G4A, ACBD4, ACOT7, ACSF2, CBR1 and ACSL5 were defined as risk factors with HRs > 1 (Table 1). The procedure is illustrated in Fig. 1.

We then used the risk score method to establish a risk signature for patients with AML based on the gene expression levels as follows: FA risk score = (0.299 * SLC25A1 expression) - (1.090 * MLYCD expression) - (0.394 * CYP4F2A expression) + (0.474 * PLA2G4A expression) + (0.488 * ACBD4 expression) + (0.538 * ACOT7 expression) + (0.566 * ACSF2 expression) + (0.632 * CBR1 expression) + (0.750 * ACSL5 expression). The patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score as the cut-off (Supplementary Fig. 1B).

Table 1 Cox Regression Analysis of TCGA RNA Sequencing Database, AML
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The flowchart of the signature construction

Full size image

Identification of the fatty acid metabolism signature as a prognostic marker in AML

We first analyzed the distribution of FA risk scores in patients with different survival statuses using a waterfall plot. Patients with lower FA risk scores generally had better survival outcomes (alive) than those with high risk scores (Fig. 2A). Then, we found that high-risk patients had shorter OS times than low-risk patients by log-rank analysis (Fig. 2B). To demonstrate the validity of the 9-gene FA metabolism risk signature in other independent populations, we calculated the risk score for each patient in the Vizome AML database [18] as an external cohort with the same formula. The patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. Consistent with the findings from the TCGA cohort, more surviving patients appeared in the low-risk group, and the OS time was shorter for high-risk patients than for low-risk patients (Fig. 2A-B). Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of the FA risk score were assessed through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 0.8297, 0.8392 and 0.8130, respectively, in the training cohort, with significant p values (Fig. 2C). For validation in the external cohort, the AUCs for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 0.6560, 0.6649 and 0.6663, respectively (Fig. 2C).

To explore the prognostic value of the fatty acid metabolism signature in stratified cohorts, the patients were classified by two traditional independent markers, age and cytogenetic risk. In the training cohort, high-risk patients had shorter OS times than low-risk patients in all stratified cohorts (Supplementary Fig. 2A-B). However, when we confirmed the results in the validation cohort, we found that the FA score only further predicted the prognosis in patients aged ≤ 60 years or with intermediate cytogenetic risk (Supplementary Fig. 2C-D). Overall, these results indicated that the FA signature is a prognostic marker in AML.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prognostic value of the fatty acid metabolism signature in AML. A Survival outcome analysis of FA score distribution in training and validation cohort. B Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the signature expressed prognostic value of AML in training and validation cohort (with log-rank test). C The time-dependent ROC curves showed the sensitivity and specificity of predicting 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival according to the signature in training and validation cohort

Full size image

The fatty acid metabolism signature is an independent risk factor for precisely predicting the survival time of AML patients

We next performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine whether the FA risk score is independently correlated with the OS of AML patients. We analyzed the prognostic value of the FA risk score together with other common prognostic factors (age, FLT3 mutation, NPM1 mutation, leukocyte count and cytogenetic risk). We found that the FA risk score served as an independent prognostic factor with an HR of 4.238 (p < 0.0001) in the training cohort and 1.406 (p = 0.077) in the validation cohort (Fig. 3A-B). Then, we conducted ROC curve analyses of the FA risk score and two other independent factors (age and cytogenetic risk) for predicting 3 years of OS in the training and validation cohorts and found that the AUC of the FA risk score was larger than that of cytogenetic risk or age (Fig. 3C). These findings confirmed the power of the FA risk score to independently predict prognosis in AML.

To achieve a better translational and predictive evaluation system, we developed a nomogram integrating age, cytogenetic risk and FA score in the training set and validation set (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. 3A). The calibration plots showed high concordance between the predicted and actual probabilities of 1-, 2- and 3-year survival (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. 3B). The C-index of the merged nomogram score in the validation set was 0.7, which was significantly higher than that of its constituting factors (Fig. 4C). However, in the training set, the C-index of the merged nomogram score was close to the C-index of the FA score but higher than that of age and cytogenetic risk (Supplementary Fig. 3C). These results suggested that incorporating the FA score with traditional AML prognostic factors could increase the precision of survival prediction compared to using the single traditional prognostic factors alone.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparing the fatty acid metabolism signature with classic prognostic factors. A Forest plots of univariate cox regression analysis in training and validation cohort. B Forest plots of multivariate cox regression analysis in training and validation cohort. C The time-dependent ROC curves showed the sensitivity and specificity of predicting 3-year overall survival according to the signature, age or cytogenetic risk in training and validation cohort

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The nomogram combined the fatty acid metabolism signature and classic prognostic factors to predict the overall survival. A Nomogram plot showed the merged score system composed of the signature, age and cytogenetic risk in validation cohort. B Calibration plot showed the consistency of nomogram-predicted OS and actual OS in validation cohort. C The C-index comparison between the merged score and its single composition in validation cohort (with t test). *, P < 0.05; ****, P < 0.0001

Full size image

Association between the fatty acid metabolism signature and the clinical features of AML

To explore the clinical features associated with the FA metabolism signature, we stratified the AML patients into FA high-risk and FA low-risk groups according to their FA scores and assessed their clinical parameters. Genes that formed the fatty acid metabolism signature exhibited distinct expression patterns corresponding to the risk score (Fig. 5A). Moreover, we found that the distribution of the FAB types and cytogenetics-based risk groups were different between the FA high- and low-risk groups, while other clinical features showed no significance (Fig. 5A). Then, we analyzed the FA risk values among the FAB subtypes and found that the M5 subtype exhibited the highest risk value, while the M3 subtype (acute promylocytic leukemia) exhibited the lowest risk value (Fig. 5B). Patients with favourable cytogenetic risk were more likely classified into the FA low-risk group (Fig. 5C). We also found that patients with poor cytogenetic risk had the highest FA risk values compared with those with intermediate or favourable cytogenic risk (Supplementary Fig. 4A). These data indicated that FA risk classification were consistent with current risk factors.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The correlation between the fatty acid metabolism signature and clinicopathological features. A Heatmaps described the association of the signature with age, gender, FAB subtype, cytogenetic risk, leukocyte count, hemoglobin count and platelet count in training and validation cohort. B The FA scores of FAB subtypes in training and validation cohort (with t test). C The distribution of cytogenetic risk between high-risk and low-risk group (with Chi-square test). ns, no significance; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001

Full size image

The fatty acid metabolism signature is correlated with mitochondrial metabolism, and the high-risk group exhibits an enhanced immune response

To explore the related functions of the fatty acid metabolism signature, we analyzed the genes closely correlated with the FA score (R > = 0.5) in the TCGA and Vizome databases (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). The results of Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that the signature was associated with mitochondrial metabolism, including the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation, in both databases (Fig. 6A). Moreover, to further investigate the differential biological functions between the high-risk and low-risk groups, we screened out differentially expressed genes (upregulated in the high-risk group; log fold change (logFC) > 0.6 in TCGA, logFC > 0.7 in Vizome; p < 0.05; Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). We found that most relevant biological processes were enriched in the immune response, inflammatory response and innate immune response through GO analysis (Fig. 6B). To confirm these associations, we conducted gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of immune-related terms, and the results showed that positive regulation of the immune effector process, IFN-γ biosynthetic process, chronic inflammatory response and regulation of lymphocyte chemotaxis were positively enriched in the high-risk group (Fig. 6C). These results suggested that the high-risk group might exhibit an enhanced immune response. In addition, we explored twenty proteins that interacted with the nine FA score proteins through GeneMANIA, and most of the twenty proteins were included in lipid metabolism pathways (Fig. 6D).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Related function analysis of the fatty acid metabolism signature. A GO analysis based on signature-related genes (R > = 0.5) showing mitochondrial metabolism associated functions of the signature in training and validation cohort. B GO analysis based on differential expressed genes showing inmmune associated functions of the signature in training and validation cohort. C The results of GSEA verified the immune-related functions of the signature in training cohort. D Protein-protein interaction of the nine constituent genes using GeneMANIA

Full size image

Discussion

At present, chromosomal abnormalities and somatic gene mutations, considered the pathogenesis of AML, are combined to guide prognostic prediction and treatment selection [3, 19]. However, this evaluation system has limitations because nearly 50% of AML patients harbour a normal karyotype, and some patients even lack common somatic mutations [20]. Thus, it is essential to develop new signatures to further stratify the heterogeneous prognosis of AML patients. In this study, we constructed a suitable prognostic signature composed of genetic expression pattern involved in fatty acid metabolism in AML patients.

Previous studies have implied that fatty acid metabolism is active in LSCs and triggers various adaptive mechanisms in favour of AML cell survival [16, 21]. Reduced synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acid from saturated fatty acid leads the increased level of ROS and finally induces apoptosis of AML cells [22]. Moreover, the liver microenvironment induces fatty acid metabolism adaptation, promoting growth and chemo-resistance of liver infiltrated leukemia [23]. However, no researchers have combined the related genes of fatty acid metabolism to predict the prognosis of AML. Here, we screened the expression profile of fatty acid metabolism and identified nine genes with prognostic significance. Most of these nine genes have been reported in different tumors [24,25,26,27,28,29] and some of them have been studied in AML such as PLA2G4A, ACOT7 and CBR1 [30,31,32]. The detailed roles of these genes in the pathogenesis of AML require further exploration.

The fatty acid metabolism signature we established could predict the clinical outcomes of AML patients independently with preferable specificity and sensitivity.Acute monocytic leukemia (AML-M5) is a poor prognostic subtype of AML associated with hyperleukocytosis, extramedullary disease, and abnormal coagulation [33]. We found that M5 subtype patients had the highest FA scores, which suggested that fatty acid metabolism might be highly activated, providing the potential therapeutic targets. Our results showed that FA score was an independent prognostic factor and the combination of FA score, age and cytogenetic risk was superior to single factor, providing a more useful tool to stratify AML patient.

Fatty acids converge into the TCA cycle and further participate in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in mitochondria. Several studies have suggested that the cellular enhancement of mitochondrial metabolism might induce Ara-C resistance, leading to poor prognosis and targeting OXPHOS sensitized AML cells to Ara-C [34, 35]. Thus, the desregulated fatty acid metabolism is an effective target and several inhibitors of FAO have been applied in preclinical AML studies [36]. Recently, researchers found that LSCs, which are drug-resistant cells, selectively depended on OXPHOS to supply energy and that the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax could inhibit OXPHOS in LSCs [37, 38]. The combination of venetoclax with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine showed promising synergistic effects on AML patients in a phase 1b clinical study [39, 40]. Further studies showed that venetoclax combined with azacitidine targeted amino acid metabolism to inhibit OXPHOS in LSCs [41]. Moreover, up-regulation of FAO due to RAS pathway mutations or compensatory adaptation in relapsed disease attenuates the essentiality of amino acid metabolism, and finally decreases the sensitivity of the combination treatment with azacitidine and venetoclax [42]. In our study, the fatty acid metabolism signature was closely correlated with mitochondrial metabolism, which is consistent with previous studies. Based on these findings, we proposed that fatty acid inhibitors might improve the efficiency of venetoclax and azacitidine combination, especially in the patients with a high-risk FA metabolism signature.

Cellular metabolic reprogramming is not only a hallmark of tumours but also a characteristic of immune cells [43]. Long-lived memory CD8 T cells (Tm), the key factors in immunotherapy, have elevated fatty acid oxidation levels, as previous studies reported [44]. Here we found that the high-risk group showed a disturbance of immune response. Therefore, we speculated that fatty acid metabolism also played the roles in the abnormal interaction between leukemic cells and the immune cells in the bone marrow environment, resulting in immune escape and drug resistance. However, the detailed mechanism needs further exploration and validation in AML.

Conclusion

Overall, we developed a prognostic signature based on nine fatty acid metabolism-related genes that could independently predict clinical outcomes with specificity and sensitivity, as well as improve the existing prognostic evaluation system. Moreover, the fatty acid metabolism signature might be an index to monitor the effect of targeted therapy.

Methods

Data collection

179 AML patients′ clinical information and transcriptome sequencing data of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were downloaded from https://xenabrowser.net. Clinical information along with transcriptome sequencing data of VIZOME (451 patients) were downloaded from http://www.vizome.org/aml/ and http://www.cbioportal.org/. Function gene sets were obtained from http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp.

Bioinformatics analysis

Limma R package was used to calculate differential expression genes between high-risk and low-risk group. The gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed by DAVID 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp) to find possible functions associated with the fatty acid metabolism signature. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was carried out to verify the AML-related functions between patients in high-risk and low-risk group (http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). Heatmaps were made by R language to express information correlated with the fatty acid metabolism signature. A nomogram model consists of independent prognostic factors was established for a better prediction of prognosis. The prediction accuracy of the merged system and its elements were determined by Calibration plot and C-index [45]. Protein–protein interaction among the nine genes was detected using the GeneMANIA datasets. GeneMANIA is frequently used datasets which can provide protein–protein interaction information [46].

Statistical analysis

R language (version 3.5.2), SPSS (20.0) and GraphPad Prism 7 were mainly used for statistical analysis and figure drawing. Univariate cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic genes. A risk signature was developed according to a linear combination of their expression levels weighted with regression coefficients from univariate cox regression analysis [47]. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to indicate prognostic values. Multivariate cox regression analysis was carried out to identify independent prognostic factors. Chi-square test was used for showing the difference of clinical features between two groups. Two-tailed t test was performed to calculate the quantitative difference between two groups. ROC curves, forest plots and survival curves were made by GraphPad Prism 7. Statistical significance was defined as P value < 0.05.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the TCGA, https://xenabrowser.net.; VIZOME, http://www.vizome.org/aml/ and http://www.cbioportal.org/; GSEA, http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp.

Abbreviations

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

GO:

Gene Ontology

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

CR:

Complete response

OS:

Overall survival

FAO:

Fatty acid oxidation

FAS:

Fatty acid synthesis

LSCs:

Leukemia stem cells

HRs:

Hazard ratios

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUCs:

Areas under the curve

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid

WBC:

White blood cell

OXPHOS:

Oxidative phosphorylation

References

  1. Chen X, et al. Targeting mitochondrial structure sensitizes Acute myeloid leukemia to Venetoclax Treatment. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(7):890–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Short N, Rytting M, Cortes J. Acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet (London England). 2018;392(10147):593–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Döhner H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(4):424–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Döhner H, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 2022;140(12):1345–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollyea D, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2021;19(1):16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WARBURG O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science (New York, 1956. 123(3191): pp. 309–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanahan D, Weinberg R. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kang H, et al. Metabolic rewiring by oncogenic BRAF V600E links ketogenesis pathway to BRAF-MEK1 signaling. Mol Cell. 2015;59(3):345–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. THE METABOLISM OF TUMORS IN THE BODY. J Gen Physiol. 1927;8(6):519–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herst P, et al. The level of glycolytic metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia blasts at diagnosis is prognostic for clinical outcome. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89(1):51–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreitz J, et al. Metabolic plasticity of Acute myeloid leukemia. Cells. 2019;8(8):805.

  12. German N, et al. PHD3 loss in Cancer enables metabolic Reliance on fatty acid oxidation via deactivation of ACC2. Mol Cell. 2016;63(6):1006–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Samudio I, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(1):142–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafat M, et al. Leukemic blasts program bone marrow adipocytes to generate a protumoral microenvironment. Blood. 2017;129(10):1320–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu Y, et al. Carnitine transporter CT2 (SLC22A16) is over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and target knockdown reduces growth and viability of AML cells. Apoptosis: an international journal on programmed cell death. 2015;20(8):1099–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ye H, et al. Leukemic stem cells evade chemotherapy by metabolic adaptation to an adipose tissue niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(1):23–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang T, et al. Apolipoprotein C2 - CD36 promotes Leukemia Growth and presents a Targetable Axis in Acute myeloid leukemia. Blood cancer discovery. 2020;1(2):198–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tyner J, et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2018;562(7728):526–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer S, Levine R. Translational implications of somatic genomics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):e382-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibáñez M, et al. Analysis of SNP array abnormalities in patients with DE NOVO Acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones R, Thompson C. Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth. Genes Dev. 2009;23(5):537–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Subedi A, et al. Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase inhibitors selectively induce apoptosis of AML stem cells by disrupting lipid homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(10):1851–67.e8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ye H, et al. The hepatic Microenvironment uniquely protects leukemia cells through induction of growth and survival pathways mediated by LIPG. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(2):500–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wan S, et al. Role of CYP4F2 as a novel biomarker regulating malignant phenotypes of liver cancer cells via the Nrf2 signaling axis. Oncol Lett. 2020;20(4):13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez H, et al. The mitochondrial citrate carrier, SLC25A1, drives stemness and therapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(7):1239–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eun H, et al. Profiling cytochrome P450 family 4 gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(6):4865–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hlouschek J, et al. The mitochondrial citrate carrier (SLC25A1) sustains Redox Homeostasis and mitochondrial metabolism supporting Radioresistance of Cancer cells with tolerance to Cycling severe hypoxia. Front Oncol. 2018;8:170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma W, et al. LOX and ACSL5 as potential relapse markers for pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(6):787–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen W, et al. Systematic analysis of Gene expression alterations and clinical outcomes for long-chain acyl-coenzyme A synthetase family in Cancer. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bai H, et al. PLA2G4A is a potential Biomarker Predicting shorter overall survival in patients with Non-M3/ wildtype Acute myeloid leukemia. DNA Cell Biol. 2020;39(4):700–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang X, et al. Expression level of ACOT7 influences the prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Cancer Biomark. 2019;26(4):441–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Varatharajan S, et al. Carbonyl reductase 1 expression influences daunorubicin metabolism in acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68(12):1577–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou F, et al. Jab1/Csn5-Thioredoxin signaling in relapsed Acute Monocytic leukemia under oxidative stress. Clin cancer research: official J Am Association Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4450–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farge T, et al. Chemotherapy-resistant human acute myeloid leukemia cells are not enriched for leukemic stem cells but require oxidative metabolism. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(7):716–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan H, et al. Association of a cytarabine chemosensitivity related gene expression signature with survival in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget. 2017;8(1):1529–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tcheng M, et al. Very long chain fatty acid metabolism is required in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2021;137(25):3518–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin K, et al. Systematic dissection of the metabolic-apoptotic interface in AML reveals Heme Biosynthesis to be a Regulator of Drug Sensitivity. Cell Metabol. 2019;29(5):1217–31. .e7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lagadinou E, et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(3):329–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. DiNardo C, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(2):216–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. DiNardo C, et al. Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2019;133(1):7–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones C, et al. Inhibition of amino acid metabolism selectively targets human leukemia stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(5):724–40.e4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stevens B, et al. Fatty acid metabolism underlies venetoclax resistance in acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Nat cancer. 2020;1(12):1176–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang T, Marquardt C, Foker J. Aerobic glycolysis during lymphocyte proliferation. Nature. 1976;261(5562):702–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pearce E, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460(7251):103–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin oncology: official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31(9):1188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Warde-Farley D, et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W214-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lossos I, et al. Prediction of survival in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma based on the expression of six genes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1828–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by fund projects: the National Youth Top-notch Talent of Ten Thousand Talent Program (2014 − 253), Translational Research Grant of HCRCH (2020ZKMB06) and Subtopic of National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB966803]. The authors would like to thank all members in Yan’s lab.

Funding

This work was supported by fund projects: the National Youth Top-notch Talent of Ten Thousand Talent Program (2014 − 253), Translational Research Grant of HCRCH (2020ZKMB06) and Subtopic of National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB966803].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, 110001, Shenyang, China

    Miao Chen, Yuan Tao, Pengjie Yue & Xiaojing Yan

  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110122, China

    Feng Guo

Authors
  1. Miao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pengjie Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaojing Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Miao Chen, Tao Yuan, Pengjie Yue, Feng Guo and Xiaojing Yan contributed to the study conceptualization. Miao Chen contributed to data curation and formal analysis. Xiaojing Yan contributed to funding acquisition and investigation. Yuan Tao took charge of the methodology. Pengjie Yue contributed to project administration. Miao Chen took charge of resources and software. Pengjie Yue contributed to supervision. Yuan Tao took charge of validation. Pengjie Yue contributed to visualization. Miao Chen contributed to writing the original draft. Xiaojing Yan and Feng Guo contributed to writing-review&editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Feng Guo or Xiaojing Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Survival curves of the nine significant genes. (A) Survival analysis revealed all the nine genes expressed prognostic value in training cohort (with log-rank test).(B) The FA score distribution in training andvalidation cohort. Supplementary Figure 2. The fatty acidmetabolism signature further predicted the prognosis of patients identified bytraditional prognostic markers. (A) Survival analysis revealed the signatureexpressed prognostic value in patients withage<=60 and intermediate risk in training cohort (with log-rank test). (B) Survival analysis revealed the signatureexpressed prognostic value in patients withage>60 and favorable or poor risk in training cohort (with log-rank test). (C) Survival analysisrevealed the signature expressed marginal prognostic value in patients with age<=60 and intermediate risk invalidation cohort (with log-ranktest). (D) Survival analysis revealed the signature without prognostic value in patients with age>60 and favorable or poor riskin validation cohort (with log-ranktest). SupplementaryFigure 3. The nomogram combined the fatty acid metabolism signature andclassic prognostic factors to predict the overall survival. (A) Nomogram plotshowed the merged score system composed of the signature, age and cytogeneticrisk in training cohort. (B) Calibration plot showed the consistency ofnomogram-predicted OS and actual OS in training cohort. (C) The C-indexcomparison between the merged score and its single composition in trainingcohort (with t test). ns, no significance; ****, P<0.0001.Supplementary Figure 4. Thecorrelation between the fatty acid metabolism signature and cytogenetic risk. (A) FA score difference among favorable,intermediate and poor risk group classified by cytogenetic risk evaluation in training and validation cohort (with t test). ns, no significance; *, P<0.05; ****, P<0.0001.  

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 1.

The prognostic value of fatty acid metabolism-related genes.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 2.

Thirty-seven genes associated with prognosis in AML.

Additional file 4: Supplemetary Table 3.

The genes closely correlated with the FA score (R>=0.5) in the TCGA database.

Additional file 5: SupplemetaryTable 4.

The genes closely correlated with the FA score (R>=0.5) in the VIZOME database.

Additional file 6: SupplementaryTable 5.

Differentially expressed genes (upregulated in the high-risk group) inthe TCGA database. 

Additional file 7: Supplementary Table 6.

Differentially expressed genes (upregulated in the high-risk group) inthe VIZOME database.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Tao, Y., Yue, P. et al. Construction and validation of a fatty acid metabolism risk signature for predicting prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. BMC Genom Data 23, 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01099-x

Keywords

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us