Skip to main content

Development and characterization of a pupal-colour based genetic sexing strain of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract

Background

Area-wide integrated pest management programs (AW-IPM) incorporating sterile insect technique (SIT) have been successful in suppressing populations of different fruit fly species during the last six decades. In addition, the development of genetic sexing strains (GSS) for different fruit fly species has allowed for sterile male-only releases and has significantly improved the efficacy and cost effectiveness of the SIT applications. The South American Fruit Fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major agricultural pest attacking several fruit commodities. This impedes international trade and has a significant negative impact on the local economies. Given the importance of sterile male-only releases, the development of a GSS for A. fraterculus would facilitate the implementation of an efficient and cost-effective SIT operational program against this insect pest species.

Results

For potential use in a GSS, three new morphological markers (mutants) were isolated in a laboratory strain of A. fraterculus sp. 1, including the black pupae (bp) gene located on chromosome VI. The black pupa phenotype was used as a selectable marker to develop genetic sexing strains by linking the wild type allele (bp+) to the Y-chromosome -via irradiation to induce a reciprocal Y-autosome translocation. Four GSS were established and one of them, namely GSS-89, showed the best genetic stability and the highest fertility. This strain was selected for further characterization and cytogenetic analysis.

Conclusions

We herein report the development of the first genetic sexing strain of a major agricultural pest, A. fraterculus sp. 1, using as a selectable marker the black pupae genetic locus.

Background

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is a species-specific and environmentally friendly genetic method to control populations of major insect pests. This method involves the rearing of the target pest species, the induction of lethal mutations and atrophy of reproductive organs to induce reproductive sterilization through the exposure to ionizing radiation, in the hope that the release of sterile insects in the wild and their mating with the wild population will result in infertile eggs [1].

The possibility of sterile male-only releases in some species has made the SIT application more efficient and cost effective in several ways. As the probability of mating between sterile males and wild females is increased, the damage of fruits due to the stinging by sterile females is avoided and, moreover, the overall costs associated with releasing and monitoring are drastically reduced [2, 3]. Male-only releases have been possible due to the development of genetic sexing strains (GSS) [4]. The principal requirements for the construction of a GSS include a selectable marker (morphological and/or conditional lethal) and the pseudo-linkage of the wild type (rescue) allele of this marker (from an autosome carrying the wild allele) with the male determining region, which in tephritid species is located on the Y chromosome. After the application of an appropriated scheme of crosses and backcrosses, it is possible to identify individuals that have the dominant wild type allele pseudo-linked to the Y-chromosome, yielding a strain that produces males with the wild type phenotype and mutant females [4,5,6,7,8].

During the last 60 years, significant progress has been achieved for the development and application of SIT against diverse insect fruit fly pests, with the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata being the model species [9]. However, despite numerous studies on all aspects of the biology and ecology of Anastrepha fraterculus including mass rearing [10], quality control [11], gamma irradiation [12], mating compatibility among different populations [13, 14], pheromones, hybridization, cytology [15], genetics [16] and cytogenetics [17], in part because of the lack of appropriate strains, it has not yet been possible to use the SIT against this pest.

The Anastrepha genus is endemic to America and is the most diverse genus of the Tephritidae [18]. A. fraterculus (Wiedemann), commonly known as the South American fruit fly, is a species of major economic and quarantine importance. It attacks more than 80 host species [19] causing severe economic losses which may reach to 100% losses if control measures are not applied. Desirable control measures include the use of integrated pest management (IPM) programs incorporating environment-friendly techniques such as the SIT [20,21,22].

The lack of genetic sexing strains which would enable sterile male-only releases has prevented the development and large-scale implementation of SIT applications, similar to the ones of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha ludens, for control of A. fraterculus. In the present study, we present the isolation of three morphological mutations, one of which (black pupae) was used as a selectable for the construction and evaluation of the first genetic strains of A. fraterculus sp. 1.

Results

Morphological description and genetic analysis of mutants

During a regular screening of a laboratory strain of A. fraterculus sp. 1 (South of Brazil and Argentina), three mutations were discovered: black pupae (bp), red body (rb) and white eye (we). The black pupae phenotype was characterized by the black color of the pupae as well as the very dark color and wing veins at the adult stage compared to the wild type phenotype (Fig. 1a and b). The morphology of the bp mutants of A. fraterculus sp. 1 was very similar to that described in the closely related species of A. ludens [8]. The red body phenotype is evident by the abnormal red body coloration only at the adult stage. At this stage, the phenotype was particularly pronounced in the light parts of the adult body and could easily be observed with naked eye (Fig. 1c). The white eye phenotype was characterized by the white colour of the adult eye and it was similar to that previously described in other species including C. capitata [23] and A. ludens [24] (Fig. 1d). Given that only the black pupae phenotype was expressed in an early developmental stage (pupal), the bp locus was chosen as a selectable marker for the development of a pupal color-based genetic sexing strain in A. fraterculus sp. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Phenotype of wild type and mutant individuals of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1

Genetic analysis indicated that the inheritance of each of the mutant phenotypes is controlled individually by single autosomal, recessive genes (Table 1). Linkage analysis showed that only the cross between rb and we was consistent with the ratio expected in F2 for independently assorting genes (9 WT:3 rb:3 we:1 rb we). The crosses between bp to rb and bp to we resulted in slight deviations from the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio (Table 1). Backcrossing males from the GSS-89 strain (see below) with double mutant females carrying rb and we confirmed that these two loci are not linked to the bp locus (Table 1).

Table 1 (a) results of inheritance mode experiments of mutants, (b) linkage analysis of red body (rb), white eye (we) and black pupae (bp) mutants and (c) GSS backcrossing to we and rb alleles in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1

Development and characterization of pupal color-based genetic sexing strain (GSS)

Six hundred males were screened for the presence of irradiation-induced translocations which could result in a genetic sexing strain characterized by only males emerging from wild type brown pupae (T(Y;bp+)/bp) and only females from mutant black pupae (bp/bp). Four such males were identified, and these were used for the establishment of genetic sexing strains designated respectively as GSS-172, GSS-119, GSS-89 and GSS-33. The pupal color phenotype in relation to the sex was closely monitored in all four GSS, for eight generations. All recombinants (males emerged from black pupae and females emerged from brown pupae) representing translocation breakdown events were removed. The strains showed different recombination rates with the lowest one observed in GSS-89 (GSS-172 = 0.39%, GSS-119 = 0.71%, GSS-89 = 0.26%, GSS-33 = 0.72%). The recombination rate was consistently lower in males compared to females in all strains (Table 2).

Table 2 Percentage of recombination per generation of the different Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 T(Y;bp+)/bp genetic sexing strains (GSS)

Cytogenetic analysis of the GSS-89 confirmed previous studies that the autosomes II to VI are polytenized in the salivary glands while chromosomes X and Y do not polytenize due to their heterochromatic nature [16, 17]. The analysis also indicated that the (Y;A) translocation involves the smallest autosome and that the translocation breakpoint is located in band 88 according to the published map of polytene chromosomes of this species (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Polytene chromosome of the Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 strain T[(Y;VI bp+)/bp]-89 (GSS-89) . a Reference map of chromosome VI (section 85–100). b The part of the VI chromosome which is involved in the (Y;A) translocation

Biological characteristics

Comparative analysis between the wild type, bp and the four T(Y;bp+)/bp GSS strains revealed significant differences in respect to fertility (F5,24 = 12.86; p < 0.001), egg to pupa survival (F5,24 = 9.73; P < 0.001), pupae to adult survival (F5,24 = 3.23; P = 0.022) and overall fitness (F5,24 = 17.00; P < 0.01) (Table 3). For these biological characteristics, the wild type strain exhibited the best values followed by the bp mutant strain. The four GSS were inferior to the wild type and the bp strains in all parameters studied; however, of these, the strain designated as GSS-89 exhibited the best values with respect to fertility and overall fitness.

Table 3 Quality control indices (Mean ± SE) of different Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 strains under laboratory rearing environment

Discussion

Three mutations were isolated in the present study to enrich the genetic tools available in this major agricultural pest species, the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus sp.1. Of the mutations recovered, the fact that the black pupae mutant phenotype is expressed at the pupal stage, much earlier that the red body and the white eye phenotypes expressed at the adult stage, was the key factor for its further characterization and selection as a selectable marker for the construction of the first genetic sexing strain in this species. Using this GSS, it becomes possible to remove females at the pupal stage during the mass rearing, and this in turn would allow SIT operational programmes to handle males-only during marking, packaging, irradiation, release and field monitoring. The use of GSS for male-only releases have been shown to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of SIT in tephritid flies [9, 25, 26] and this approach is currently being used in action programs against two major pests the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata and the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens.

It is worth noting that a black pupae mutation of the type identified here was also used as a selectable marker for the development of a GSS (namely Tapachula-7) which is currently being used in SIT applications against A. ludens [8]. However, despite the fact that these are closely related species, the bp locus appears to be carried on different autosomes in each case. In A. ludens it is carried on chromosome 2 while in A. fraterculus sp. 1, it is found on chromosome VI in [27]. It may be that the black pupae phenotype has been induced in two different loci residing on different chromosomes in these species, but alternatively, these mutations may originate from the same gene residing on chromosomes that have undergone extensive rearrangement in evolution of these two species. To resolve this, more work remains to be done to clarify the extent of homology between all of the chromosomes in these two species.

For any genetic sexing strain, especially during rearing, the stability of the translocation is an important property. All such translocations are subject to some degree of breakdown as reflected in recombination or loss of the artificial linkage relationship generated for the purposes of genetic sexing. In other studies, this has been shown to depend greatly on the structure of translocation, mainly the distance between the translocation breakpoint and the selectable marker [28]. Data presented in this study showed that during a period of eight generations, the recombination rate was less than 1% (detected as the presence of black pupa males and brown pupae females) for all of the GSS produced here, with the lowest rate (0.29%) observed in GSS-89. Notably, in these cases, brown pupae females were more abundant than black pupae males. It should also be noted that this low recombination rate was recorded under small scale rearing conditions. Any such breakdown may significantly increase during mass rearing conditions and result in the risk of compromising the genetic stability of the GSS. However, the application of a filter rearing system designed to remove any recombinants at the early stages of the mass rearing process, and/or the incorporation of chromosome inversions, have both been shown to help ensure the genetic integrity of any GSS [29].

However, because of the (Y;A) translocation, only 50% of the sperm produced by males of the GSS are genetically balanced, and for this reason the GSS are considered as semi-sterile [4, 8, 30, 31]. The evaluation of the strains used in the present study showed that among all GSS developed here, the GSS-89 is the most fertile (about 54% fertility). This result, in combination with its low recombination rate, suggests that it could be a productive and genetically stable GSS under mass rearing conditions. However, it is strongly recommended that any GSS which will be used for mass rearing and male-only releases in an SIT operational programme should always be selected from a large number of translocation lines, each of which has been assessed with respect to their genetic stability and productivity.

It is also worth noting that, given the fact that A. fraterculus is a species complex consisting of at least eight morphotypes, it may be possible to develop and implement an appropriate genetic introgression scheme to transfer the mutant bp allele from one morphotype to another while at the same time largely maintaining their genetic integrity. A similar approach has been recently applied among some Bactrocera species [32]. Such an approach should significantly facilitate the development of pupal color based genetic sexing strains for each of the members of the A. fraterculus species complex.

Conclusions

The present study reports on three novel morphological mutations in A. fraterculus sp. 1. One of these, the black pupae mutation, was used a selectable marker for the construction of the first genetic sexing strains in this species. Initially, four genetic sexing strains [T(Y;bp+)/bp] were developed and evaluated in respect to their genetic stability and productivity. From this, the strain designated as GSS-89 was chosen as being the most genetically stable and productive. As the selection is based on the pupal color, using this strain a robust sex separation system can also be established by using a color sorting machine. This would allow for male-only releases and would greatly facilitate the development and implementation of large scale operational SIT programmes against this important pest in South America.

Methods

Insects

During a routine screening, three new morphological markers (mutants) were isolated by J. S. Meza (JSM) and D. F. Segura (DFS) from A. fraterculus sp. 1 population at the Insect Pest Control Laboratory (IPCL), Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Seibersdorf, Vienna, Austria [33], and respective colonies of each of the mutant lines were established. These spontaneous mutations were designated as; black pupaebp (JSM), red body – rb (JSM) and white eye – we (DFS). All wild type and mutant colonies were maintained under an artificial rearing system as described by [10].

Genetic analysis of the morphological mutations

Single pair matings between flies from the three mutant lines and wild type (WT) flies were performed reciprocally in order to determine the inheritance pattern. The F1 generation progeny were interbred in groups of five pairs to obtain the F2 generation, and the F2 phenotypes were recorded. In a separate experiment, crosses between mutants were carried out. The F1 generation progeny were interbred and the F2 phenotypes were recorded to assess their potential linkage relationships. In addition, double-homozygous mutant females (rb we) were back-crossed to T(Y;bp+)/bp males to assess the linkage relationships of bp to the rb and we loci.

Generation of translocations for development of a pupal color-based genetic sexing strain (GSS)

One day before eclosion, pupae from the WT strain were gamma-irradiated at 30 Gy by using Gamma Cell Cobalt60. Irradiated WT males were mated with black pupae (bp/bp) females. Over 600 WT F1 males were individually backcrossed to five bp/bp females in small containers (families). The F2 phenotypes of each family were recorded and families potentially carrying translocation T(Y;bp+)/bp were identified as those having males emerged from brown pupae (WT) and females from black pupae [6, 8, 34]. Such families were used to develop the GSS by crossing, in each generation, brown pupae males to black pupae females and removing all recombinants (black pupae males and brown pupae females).

Biological characteristics

The biological characteristics of the WT, bp mutant, and the genetic sexing strains (GSS-172, GSS-119, GSS-89 and GSS-33) were assessed by rearing the strains at 25 ± 1 °C. The collected eggs were incubated for 2 days in aerated water. After the incubation period, one thousand eggs from each strain were transferred on an artificial diet in groups of 200 eggs aligned on a small piece of cloth mesh. Three days after the transfer of the eggs to the diet, the number of eggs hatched were recorded to estimate the fertility. Ten days after the transfer of the eggs, the larvae were removed from the artificial diet and placed into a recipient tray with sawdust to complete the pupation (12 days) and during the separation of pupae from the sawdust by sieving, the number of mature pupae were placed in a Petri dish and recorded to estimate egg-to-pupa survival. The number of emerged adults was then recorded to estimate the pupa-to-adult survival.

Cytogenetic analysis

Third instar male larvae were used for preparation of the salivary gland polytene chromosomes for analysis of the GSS-89 genetic sexing strain of A. fraterculus sp. 1, using the method described previously for C. capitata [35] and for A. ludens [36]. Briefly, the male larvae (identified based on the brown coloration of the anal lobes) were dissected in 45% acetic acid and transferred to 3 mol/L HCl for 1 min. Chromosomes were fixed in glacial acetic acid – water – lactic acid (3:2:1, respectively) for about 5 min before being stained in lactoacetic orcein for 10–15 min. Excess stain was removed by washing the glands in lacto-acetic acid before squashing. Chromosome slides were analyzed at 60x and 100x objectives in a phase contrast microscope (LEIKA DMR). Well spread nuclei or isolated chromosomes were photographed using a digital camera (ProgResCFcool JENOPTIC/JENA/Germany) [17].

Data analysis

The genetic crosses data were evaluated using contingency tables and Pearson Chi-squared tests. Each biological characteristic was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the “strain” as predictor of fertility, egg to pupa survival, pupa to adult survival and overall fitness [(Fertility/100)(egg-to-pupae/100)(pupae-to-adult/100)]. The Tukey’s HSD test was used as a post-hoc method to compare means between strains on significant factors. In order to normalize the data distribution and stabilize the variances, the data in percentages were transformed following \( arcsine\sqrt{x+1} \) [37]. All data were analyzed with Statistical Discovery JMP 11.0.0 software (SAS institute).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

SENASICA:

Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad

IICA:

Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization

IAEA:

International Atomic Energy Agency

AW-IPM:

Area-wide Integrated

SIT:

Sterile Insect Technique

GSS:

Genetic Sexing Strain

IPM:

Integrated Pest Management

IPCL:

Insect Pest Control Laboratory

WT:

Wild Type

References

  1. 1.

    Knipling EF. Sterile-male method of population control. Science. 1959;130:902–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McInnis D, Tam S, Grace C, Miyashita D. Population suppression and sterility rates induced by variable sex ratio, sterile insect releases of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1994;87:231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rendon P, McInnis D, Lance D, Stewart J. Medfly (Diptera: Tephritidae) genetic sexing: large-scale field comparison of males-only and bisexual sterile fly releases in Guatemala. J Econ Entomol. 2004;97:1547–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Franz G. Genetic sexing strains in Mediterranean fruit fly, an example for other species amenable to large-scale-rearing for the sterile insect technique. In: Dick VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, editors. Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. p. 427–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Meccariello A, Salvemini M, Primo P, Hall B, Koskinioti P, Dalíková M, Gravina A, Gucciardino MA, Forlenza F, Gregoriou ME, Ippolito D, Monti SM, Petrella V, Perrotta MM, Schmeing S, Ruggiero A, Scolari F, Giordano E, Tsoumani KT, Marec F, Windbichler N, Nagaraju J, Arunkumar KP, Bourtzis K, Mathiopoulos KD, Ragoussis J, Vitagliano L, Tu Z, Papathanos PA, Robinson MD, Saccone G. Maleness-on-the-Y (MoY) orchestrates male sex determination in major agricultural fruit fly pests. Science. 2019;365:1457–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McInnis DO, Tam S, Lim R, Komatsu J, Kurashima R, Albrecht C. Development of pupal color-based genetic sexing strain of the melón fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2004;97:1026–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McCombs SD, Saul SH. Translocation-based genetic sexing system for the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on pupal color dimorphism. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1995;88:695–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zepeda-Cisneros CS, Meza-Hernández JS, García-Martínez V, Ibañez-Palacios J, Zacharopoulou A, Franz G. Development, genetic and cytogenetic analyses of genetic sexing strains of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Genet. 2014;15(Suppl 2):S1 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cáceres C, Cayol JP, Enkerlin W, Franz G, Hendrichs, Robinson AS. Comparison of mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) (Tephrritidae) bisexual and genetic sexing starins: development, evaluation and economics. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly of Economic Importance. Stellenbosch: Barnes, BN; 2002. p. 367–81. 6–10 May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jaldo HE, Gramajo MC, Willink E. Mass rearing of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae): a preliminary strategy. Fla Entomol. 2001;84:716–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vera MT, Abraham S, Oviedo A, Willink E. Demographic and quality control parameters of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) artificial rearing. Fla Entomol. 2007;90:53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Allinghi A, Calcagno G, Petit-Marty N, Gómez Cendra P, Segura D, Vera T, et al. Compatibillity and competitiveness of a laboratory strain of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) after irradiation treatment. Fla Entomol. 2007;90:27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Petit-Marty N, Vera MT, Calcagno G, Cladera JL, Segura DF, Allinghi A, Rodriguero MS, Gómez-Cendra PV, Viscarret MM, Vilardi JC. Sexual behavior and mating compatibility among four populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Argentina. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2004;97:1320–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rull J, Abraham S, Kovaleski A, Segura DF, Islam A, Wornoayporn V, Dammalage T, Santo Tomas U, Vera MT. Random mating and reproductive compatibility among Argentinean and southern Brazilian populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull Entomol Res. 2012;102:435–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Caceres C, Segura DF, Vera MT, Wornoayporn V, Cladera JL, Teal P, Sapountzis P, Bourtzis K, Zacharopoulou A, Robinson AS. Incipient speciation revealed in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera; Tephritidae) by studies on mating compatibility, sex pheromones, hybridization, and cytology. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;97:152–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Selivon D, Perondini ALP, Morgante JS. A genetic-morphological characterization of two cryptic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2005;98:367–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gariou-Papalexiou A, Giardini MC, Augustinos AA, Drosopoulou E, Lanzavecchia SB, Cladera JL, Caceres C, Bourtzis K, Mavragani-Tsipidou P, Zacharoulou A. Cytogenetic analysis of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) species complex: construction of detailed photographic polytene chromosome maps of the Argentinian Af. sp. 1 member. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157192.

  18. 18.

    Aluja M. Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annu Rev Entomol. 1994;39:155–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Silva NM, Neto SS, Zucchi RA. The natural host plants of Anastrepha in the state of Amazonas, Brasil. In: Fruit fly pest: a word assessment of their biology and management. Boca Raton: McPheron BA and Ateck G; 1996. p. 353–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roessler Y. Insecticidal bait and cover sprays. In: Robinson AS, Hooper GB, editors. Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989. p. 3B329–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Harter WR, Botton M, Nava DE, Grutzmacher AD, da Silva GR, Junior RM, Zanardi OZ. Toxicities and residual effects of toxic baits containing spinosad or malathion to control the adult Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol. 2015;98:202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Klassen W. Area-wide integrated pest management and the sterile insect technique. In: Dick VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson AS, editors. Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. p. 39–68.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sharp JL, Chambers DL. A white-eyed mutant of the Mediterranean fruit fly. J Econ Entomol. 1973;66:560–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zepeda-Cisneros CS, Meza JS, Gálvez S, Ibañez J, Robinson AS. Inheritance and linkage studies on eye color mutations in Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2010;103:96–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hendrichs J, Franz G, Rendon P. Increased effectiveness and applicability of the sterile insect technique through male-only releases for control of Mediterranean fruit flies during fruiting seasons. J Appl Entomol. 1995;119:371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Orozco D, Meza JS, Zepeda S, Solís E, Quintero-Fong JL. Tapachula-7, a new genetic sexing strain of the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): sexual compatibility and competitiveness. J Econ Entomol. 2003;106:735–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zacharopoulou A, Augustinos AA, Drosopoulou E, Tsoumani KT, Gariou-Papalexiou A, Franz G, Mathiopoulos KD, Bortzis K, Mavragani-Tsipidou P. A review of more than 30 years of cytogenetic studies of Tephritidae in support of sterile insect technique and global trade. Entomol Exp Appl. 2017;164:204–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Franz G, Gencheva E, Kerremans PH. Improved stability of genetic sexseparation strains for the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Genome. 1994;37:72–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fisher K, Cáceres C. A filter rearing system for mass reared genetic sexing strains of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). In Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests: Joint Proceedings of the International Conference in Area-Wide Control of Insects Pests: May 28–June 2 1998; and the Fifth International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, June 1–5 1998; Penang, Malaysia Tan KH. Penarbit, Malaysia: Universiti Sains, Pulau Pinang, 1 2000, 543–550.

  30. 30.

    Morrison NI, Franz G, Koukidou M, Miller TA, Saccone G, Alphey L, Beech CJ, Nagaraju J, Simmons GS, Polito LC. Genetic improvements to the sterile insect technique for agricultural pests. Asia Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol. 2010;18:275–95.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Robinson AS, Franz G, Fisher K. Genetic sexing strains in the medfly, Ceratitis capitata: development, mass-rearing and field application. Trends Entomol. 1999;2:81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Isasawin S, Aketarawong N, Lertsiri S, Thanaphum S. Development of a genetic sexing strain in Bactrocera carambolae (Diptera: Tephritidae) by introgression of sex sorting components from B. dorsalis, Salaya1 strain. BMC Genet. 2014;15(Suppl 2):S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hernández-Ortiz V, Bartolucci AF, Morales-Valles P, Frías D, Selivon D. Cryptic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): a multivariate approach for the recognition of south American morphotypes. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2012;105:305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Meza JS, Schetelig MF, Zepeda-Cisneros CS, Handler AM. Male-specific Y-linked transgene markers to enhance biologically-based control of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Genet. 2014;15(Suppl 2):S4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zacharopoulou A. Polytene chromosome maps in the medfly Ceratitis capitata. Genome. 1990;33:184–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    García-Martínez V, Hernández-Ortiz E, Zepeda-Cisneros CS, Robinson AS, Zacharopoulou A, Franz G. Mitotic and polytene chromosome analysis in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Genome. 2009;52:20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall Inc.; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Silvana Caravantes, Martha Guillen and Ulysses Sto. Tomas from the IPCL for their technical assistance during this study. We thank Ihsan ul Haq for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. This study has benefitted from discussions at the International Atomic Energy Agency funded meetings for the Coordinated Research Project ‘Comparing Rearing Efficiency and Competitiveness of Sterile Male Strains Produced by Genetic, Transgenic or Symbiont-based Technologies’.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Genetics Volume 21 Supplement 2, 2020: Comparing rearing efficiency and competitiveness of sterile male strains produced by genetic, transgenic or symbiont-based technologies. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcgenet.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-21-supplement-2.

Funding

Publication costs are funded by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA (CRP No.: D4.20.16) Vienna, Austria. The funding body did not play any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the study: JSM, CC, AZ, KB. Conducted the experiments and analysed the results: JSM, AZ, AGP. Drafted the manuscript: JSM, CC, KB. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José S. Meza.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source is given.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meza, J.S., Bourtzis, K., Zacharopoulou, A. et al. Development and characterization of a pupal-colour based genetic sexing strain of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 (Diptera: Tephritidae). BMC Genet 21, 134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00932-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mass rearing
  • Sterile insect technique
  • Mutation
  • Translocation