Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The main WAP isoform usually found in camel milk arises from the usage of an improbable intron cryptic splice site in the precursor to mRNA in which a GC-AG intron occurs



Whey acidic protein (WAP) is a major protein identified in the milk of several mammalian species with cysteine-rich domains known as four-disulfide cores (4-DSC). The organization of the eutherian WAP genes is highly conserved through evolution. It has been proposed that WAP could play an important role in regulating the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells. A bacteriostatic activity was also reported. Conversely to the other mammalian species expressing WAP in their milk, camel WAP contains 4 additional amino acid residues at the beginning of the second 4-DSC domain, introducing a phosphorylation site. The aim of this study was to elucidate the origin of this specificity, which possibly impacts its physiological functions.


Using LC-ESI-MS, we identified in Camelus bactrianus from Kazakhstan a phosphorylated whey protein, exhibiting a molecular mass (12,596 Da), 32 Da higher than the original WAP (12,564 Da) and co-eluting with WAP. cDNA sequencing revealed a transition G/A, which modifies an amino acid residue of the mature protein (V12 M), accounting for the mass difference observed between WAP genetic variants. We also report the existence of two splicing variants of camel WAP precursors to mRNA, arising from an alternative usage of the canonical splice site recognized as such in the other mammalian species. However, the major camel WAP isoform results from the usage of an unlikely intron cryptic splice site, extending camel exon 3 upstream by 12-nucleotides encoding the 4 additional amino acid residues (VSSP) in which a potentially phosphorylable Serine residue occurs. Combining protein and cDNA sequences with genome data available (NCBI database), we report another feature of the camel WAP gene which displays a very rare GC-AG type intron. This result was confirmed by sequencing a genomic DNA fragment encompassing exon 3 to exon 4, suggesting for the GC donor site a compensatory effect in terms of consensus at the acceptor exon position.


Combining proteomic and molecular biology approaches we report: the characterization of a new genetic variant of camel WAP, the usage of an unlikely intron cryptic splice site, and the occurrence of an extremely rare GC-AG type of intron.


Camel milk is characterized by a high content of vitamin C (average content ranging between 50 and 250 mg/L), and endowed with a unique composition of protein components [1,2,3]. Its protein content (35–50 g/L) is rather high [4], with ca. 80% are caseins and 20% whey proteins that are soluble at pH 4.6 whereas caseins precipitate close to this pH. The casein fraction comprises 4 caseins (αs1-, αs2-, β- and κ-casein) encoded by four autosomal genes (CSN1S1, CSN1S2, CSN2 and CSN3, respectively) mapped on chromosome 6 in cattle and goat [5, 6]. This fraction is rather complex with many splicing variants and post-translational modifications [3]. Whey proteins of camel milk mainly consist of α-lactalbumin (α-LA), glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1 (GlyCAM1) or lactophorin which is closely related to the bovine proteose peptone component 3 (PP3), the innate immunity Peptido Glycan Recognition Protein (PGRP) and the Whey Acidic Protein (WAP).

WAP is a major whey protein identified in the milk of several species from eutherians as well as marsupial and monotremes [7]. It was first shown to be secreted in rodent milks [8], and a whey protein, rich in half-cystine residues (n = 16), showing strong similarities with rodents WAPs was characterized two years later in camel milk [9]. Then, the WAP has been identified in rabbits [10], porcine [11], wallaby [12], brushtail possum [13] and more recently in canine [14] milks. Camel WAP reaches an average concentration (157 mg/L) 10-folds lower than that (1500 mg/L) in rodents milk [15], whereas it is a hundred times higher (15 g/L) in rabbit milk [16]. Whey acidic protein (WAP) is expressed in the mammary gland under an extracellular matrix and lactogenic hormones regulation [17]. WAP gene expression is induced by prolactin, inhibited by progesterone, and strongly amplified by glucocorticoids [18].

The overall organization of the eutherian WAP genes is highly conserved through evolution [7, 19]. It is composed of 4 exons: E1, E3, E4 and E6 (Fig. 1). While the size of each exon remains rather conserved between species, intron size varies considerably. The first exon encodes the 5’-UTR, N-terminal signal peptide of 19 aa residues, and the first 8–10 aa residues of mature eutherian proteins. Exons 3 and 4 encode two cysteine-rich domains (DI and DIIA) known as four-disulfide cores (4-DSC) in eutherian species [8]. A third domain (DIII) encoded by exon 2 (missing in eutherian genes) is found in Monotrema and Marsupial species [7]. Exon 6 encodes the last 5–9 aa residues and the 3’-UTR while exon 5 (DIIB) is only used in Platypus and Marsupial species [7]. Even though, the promoter region of WAP gene is similar to house-keeping genes with weak or absent TATA signal [15], WAP is not found in all eutherian milks. The functionality of the gene encoding WAP has been lost in ruminants and primates due to a frameshift mutation [20]. Consequently, there is no WAP in the milk of ruminants and primates.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Multiple sequences alignment of WAP among Eutherian species including camel (NCBI, LOC105095719), pig (O46655), dog (GenBank AAEX02035361, positions 25,184-23,606), rabbit (P09412), rat (G3 V718), and mouse (Q7M748). Four exons: E1, E3, E4 and E6 (numbering of the putative ancestral gene, proposed by [7], are given in black boxes. Exons 3 and 4 represent 4-DSC domains (DI and DIIA), while exons 1 and 6 indicate the signal peptide (SP) with the N-terminal part (N-ter) of the mature protein and the C-terminal part (C-ter) of the protein, respectively. WAP motifs are boxed in pink. Conserved Cysteine residues (C) in each 4-DSC domain are pink shaded. Residues identical in more than 3 animal species are grey shaded. Gaps are introduced to maximize similarities. Tetrapeptide VSSP, that is specific to camel WAP, is highlighted in yellow

The presence of 4-DSC domains in cysteine-rich proteins led to their classification as the WAP gene family. Proteins containing WAP domains with a characteristic 4-DSC occur not only in mammals but also in birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish [21]. Each domain comprises eight cysteine residues with a core of six spatially conserved, while the remaining two are positioned at variable distances amino terminal from the core [22].

The sequence conservation of 4-DSC motifs across species is significant, and it seems likely that the region may be involved in the biological function of the molecule. WAPs share structural similarity with serine protease inhibitors containing WAP motif domains characterized by a four-disulfide core (4-DSC) [8]. Possible physiological functions of WAP have been proposed, based on its similarity to protease inhibitor [16]. Using in vitro and in vivo systems, Nukumi et al. [23] suggested that WAP plays an important role in regulating the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells by preventing elastase-type serine proteases from carrying out extracellular matrix laminin degradation. In addition, the same authors report a bacteriostatic activity of rat WAP against Staphylococcus aureus [24]. In marsupial, Sharp et al. [7] suggest that WAP may play also a role in the development of the young. WFDC2, a second WAP-like protein, is differentially expressed in the mammary gland of the tammar wallaby and provides immune protection to the mammary gland and the developing pouch young [25].

The present study was undertaken first to search for WAP genetic polymorphism in camel species (Camelus bactrianus and Camelus dromedarius) from Kazakhstan. The alignment of sequences of WAP from 5 Eutherian species in which the WAP gene is expressed reveals the occurrence of an additional sequence of 4 amino acid residues in the camel WAP (Fig. 1). We show that this insertion is due to the usage of an intron cryptic splice site. Finally, results reported here clarify discrepancies and erroneous data found in sequence databases (predicted sequence from genomic data) and literature. We also report that in camel, the gene encoding WAP comprises a rare GC-AG intron-type that represents less than 1% of annotated donor sites, which is at the origin of predicted sequence anomalies.


Milk sample collection and preparation

Raw milk samples were collected during morning milking on healthy dairy camels (n = 179) that belonged to two species: C. bactrianus (n = 72) and C. dromedarius (n = 65), and their hybrids (n = 42) at different lactation stages, ranging between 30 and 90 days postpartum. Those milk samples were skimmed as previously described [3] and skimmed milks and fat were stored at − 20 °C and − 80 °C, respectively, until analysis.

Selection of Milk samples for analysis

A set of 58 milk samples, including individuals from each camel species and grazing regions, was selected, based on lactation stages and number of parities (from 2 to 14), for SDS-PAGE analysis. Then, eight (C. bactrianus, n = 3, C. dromedarius, n = 3, and hybrids, n = 2) of those 58 milk samples from three different regions exhibiting the most representative profiles were analyzed by LC-MS/MS (LTQ-Orbitrap Discovery, Thermo Fisher) after tryptic digestion of excised gel bands. Additionally, 30 milk samples (C. bactrianus, n = 10; C. dromedarius, n = 10; hybrids, n = 10), taken from the 58 milks analyzed by SDS-PAGE, were analyzed by LC-ESI-MS (Bruker Daltonics). One camel milk sample (C. bactrianus) displaying a WAP genetic polymorphism in LC-ESI-MS was selected for amplification of WAP cDNA by RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing.

Milk fat globule collection - RNA extraction and single-Strand cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from milk fat globules (MFG) fraction stored at − 80 °C using LS Trizol (Invitrogen) following the protocol from the manufacturer, as described by Brenaut et al. [26]. Then, first-strand cDNA was synthesized as described [3]. One microliter of 2 U/μL RNase H (Invitrogen Life Technologies) was then added to remove RNA from heteroduplexes. Single-strand cDNA thus obtained was stored at − 20 °C.

Genomic DNA isolation

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from fresh blood of C. dromedarius collected in EDTA using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA). Briefly, for 3 mL blood sample volume, 9 mL of Cell Lysis Solution was added and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min at room temperature (RT), after incubating the mixture for 10 min, at RT. The supernatant was removed and, 3 mL of Nuclei Lysis Solution was added to the resuspended white pellet containing white blood cells. The solution was pipeted 5-6 times to lyse the white blood cells. Then, 1 mL of Protein Precipitation Solution was added to the nuclear lysate, and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min, at RT. The supernatant was transferred to a 15 mL tube containing 3 mL isopropanol and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 1 min, at RT. Gently mix the solution and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 1 min, at RT. After decanting the supernatant, one sample volume of 70% ethanol was added to the DNA. After 1 min centrifugation at 2000 x g, the ethanol was aspirated using a drawn Pasteur pipette and the pellet was air-dried for 10–15 min. DNA was rehydrated by adding 250 μL of DNA Rehydration Solution and incubated at 65 °C for 1 h and stored at 4 °C.

PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

cDNA and gDNA samples were amplified using primer pairs, of which sequences are given in Table 1, designed starting from the published Camelus gene sequence (NCBI, LOC105095719) and synthesized by Eurofins genomics (Ebersberg, Germany). PCR was performed in an automated thermocycler GeneAmp® PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, USA) with GoTaq® G2 Flexi DNA Polymerase Kit (Promega Corporation, USA). Reactions were carried out in 0.2 mL thin-walled PCR tubes, as described by Ryskaliyeva et al. [3], using the following PCR cycling conditions: denaturation of cDNA template at 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles at 94 °C for 45 s (denaturation), 58 °C for 30 s (annealing) and 72 °C for 1 min (extension), with a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. Sequencing of PCR fragments was performed using PCR primers from both strands, according to the Sanger method by Eurofins MWG GmbH (Ebersberg, Germany).

Table 1 Primers used to amplify the cDNA and gDNA target of the WAP gene

1D sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and protein identification by LC-MS/MS analysis

Both major and low-abundance proteins resolved by SDS-PAGE were identified by tandem mass analysis (LC-MS/MS) after excision of the relevant bands from the gel and trypsin digestion [28]. The SDS-PAGE conditions was that from Laemmli [3, 27].


Fractionation of camel milk proteins and determination of their molecular masses were performed by coupling RP-HPLC to ESI-MS (micrOTOF™ II focus ESI-TOF mass spectrometer; Bruker Daltonics) as described [3]. Clarified milk samples (25 μL) were directly injected onto a Biodiscovery C5 reverse phase column (300 Å pore size, 3 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm; Supelco, France). Eluted proteins were detected by UV-absorbance at 214 nm and the effluent directly introduced to the mass spectrometer. Positive ion mode was used, and mass scans were acquired over a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) ranging between 600 and 3000 Da [3].


Nucleotide sequence of camel WAP cDNA

Using the rabbit and rodents WAP encoding gene sequences as references, we searched for the expected fourth exon of the WAP gene in the camel genome sequence (NCBI, LOC105095719). A pair of primers (Table 1) was thus designed, in the first exon upstream the coding sequence (forward) and overlapping the downstream putative AATAAA polyA signal (reverse), to amplify a cDNA fragment that was subsequently sequenced. The cDNA sequence of camel WAP thus obtained and given at Fig. 2, consists of 563 nucleotides encoding a 136 aa polypeptide of Mr 14,510.72 Da, including the signal peptide. The molecular mass of the corresponding mature protein is: 12,564.32 Da.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Nucleotide sequence of camel WAP cDNA. Primer pairs used for PCR and cDNA sequencing are highlighted in green. Start and stop codons are highlighted in fuchsia. AA residues encoded by triplet codons are bolded and in blue. The coding sequence and non-coding sequences are highlighted in cyan and grey, respectively

Identification and characterization of a new WAP genetic variant in Bactrian camel milk

LC-ESI-MS analysis of a Bactrian camel milk from the Shymkent region (Fig. 3), revealed the presence, in peak III (Table 2), of two molecular masses differing by 80 Da (one phosphate group) 12,596 Da and 12,676 Da, besides the cognate WAP (12,564 Da and 12, 644 Da). Such a result and the small mass difference (32 Da) strongly suggested the existence of a novel WAP genetic variant, which had not been described so far in camels.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Milk protein profiling by LC-ESI-MS of a Bactrian camel milk from the Shymkent region. Eleven major milk protein fractions were identified from RP-HPLC profile (3.A) in the following order: glycosylated κ-CN A and B (I), non-glycosylated κ-CN A and B (II), WAP (III), shorter (∆ex16 and 13′) + short (∆ex16) isoforms of αs1-CN A and C (IV and V), α-LAC + αs1-CN A and C + (VI), αs2-CN* (VII), PGRP + αs2-CN* (VIII), LPO/CSA (IX), β-CN A and B (X) and γ2-CN A and B (XI). Multicharged-ions spectrum from compounds contained in fraction III (3.B). After deconvolution (3.C) the spectrum shows the presence of cognate camel WAP A-0P (12,546 Da) and 1P (12,644 Da) indicated in black, and molecular masses corresponding to a new WAP variant (named B) without (12,596 Da) and with (12,676 Da) one phosphate group, indicated in red. *Splicing variants of αs2-CN with different phosphorylation levels (Ryskaliyeva et al., submitted)

Table 2 Identification of WAP from molecular mass determination using LC-ESI-MS of a clarified Bactrian milk

Nucleotide sequences of two unrelated individuals (including the Bactrian camel from the Shymkent region) were compared across the complete coding sequence of the camel WAP cDNA, in both directions. PCR yielded a fragment of the expected length (ca. 560 bp) for a complete mRNA open reading frame of 408 bp, demonstrating that the primary transcript was correctly spliced. However, examining the nucleotide sequence manually, a transition G/A may be easily noticed (Fig. 4), leading to the fourth codon change (GTG/ATG) of exon 2, confirmed by the reverse complement sequence. This single base substitution corresponds to a V/M amino acid substitution in position 12 of the mature protein, in agreement with the mass difference of 32 Da (V12 M, 99 Da = > 131 Da), found between WAP variants detected in LC-ESI-MS. We propose to name the camel WAP (V12) described by Beg et al. [9] as variant A and the newly identified variant (M12) as variant B. Consequently, molecular masses observed by LC-ESI-MS (12,596 Da, 12,676 Da) precisely correspond to unphosphorylated and phosphorylated (1P) isoforms of WAP variant B, respectively. This B variant which was found in only one (Bactrian) of the 30 camel milk samples analyzed in LC-ESI-MS, at the heterozygous state, appeared therefore to be rare in the Kazakh population. As far as variant A is concerned, the unphosphorylated isoform seems to be prevalent, with relative proportions between unphosphorylated and phosphorylated protein ranging between 70/30 and 55/45, whereas the phosphorylated isoform is predominant (40/60) with the Bactrian camel heterozygous A/B.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Partial sequence of WAP cDNA from C. bactrianus from Shymkent region. Nucleotides arising by manual reading, as G/A and C/T transitions, in forward (F) and reverse (R) sequences, respectively, are pointed out by vertical red arrows Nucleotides are clustered by three (codon) corresponding to aa residues (below codons in the forward sequence)

Camel WAP may exist as two isoforms differing in size

LC-MS/MS implemented to confirm the identification of major camel milk proteins [3] revealed the existence of two WAP isoforms. Indeed, two tryptic peptides: SCTVPLMVSSPEPVLK and SCTVPLMEPVLK identifying camel WAP and differentiating in the presence or absence of the VSSP tetrapeptide (Table 3) were found in four of the eight individuals analyzed, belonging to the three camel species. However, the amount of the isoform lacking the tetrapeptide VSSP appeared too weak (1 spectrum vs 10 spectra with VSSP) to be detected by LC-ESI-MS that is less sensitive than LC-MS/MS.

Table 3 Sequences of WAP tryptic peptides identified by LC-MS/MS in the milk of a C. bactrianus


Here we provide the complete camel WAP mRNA sequence (408 nucleotides open reading frame) that encodes a N-terminal signal peptide of 19 aa residues and a mature protein of 117 aa residues, of which the molecular mass is 12,564 Da, and we report the occurrence in C. bactrianus from Kazakhstan of a WAP genetic variant, exhibiting a molecular mass of 12,596 Da (unphosphorylated isoform). cDNA sequencing revealed a transition G/A, which modifies an amino acid residue of the mature protein (V12 M), accounting for the mass difference (32 Da) observed between this new genetic variant and the originally described variant [9].

Camel WAP is phosphorylated

Camel WAP contains five potential phosphorylation sites (S-X-A code) per molecule (S17, S18, S19, S58, and S87), meanwhile rat WAP has only three potential phosphorylation sites [29]. Whereas rat WAP is phosphorylated, it was reported that mouse WAP is apparently non-phosphorylated [8]. From mass data, it is clear that only one site is phosphorylated in camel WAP. Given the extremely constrained and compact structure of the molecule with 8 S-S bridges, essential for folding and functionality of the protein, it is very likely that S58 which is located within the additional sequence connecting the two 4-DSC domains, is the only one seryl residue which is alternatively phosphorylated in camel. Therefore, the other potential phosphorylation sites, namely S17, S18, S19 and S87, should not be phosphorylated. Indeed, WAP contains 16 cysteinyl (C) residues, all of which being involved in disulfide bridges. C residues appear in unique arrangements, divided into two domains. Camel WAP consists of two 4-DSC domains, which are located between aa residues 9 and 55 (DI) and 64 and 111 (DIIA). Each domain begins with a six aa WAP motif (9GQAVCP14 and 64KDGRCP69), containing the first C residue of the 8 found in the domain.

The usage of an unlikely intron cryptic splice site is responsible for the insertion of 4 amino acid residues in the major camel WAP isoform

Camel WAP shows the higher sequence identity at the aa level (76%) to porcine WAP and much lower aa sequence identities to the WAP from dog (65%), rabbit (51%), rat (40%) and mouse (39%). The comparison of camel WAP sequence with that of the other 5 eutherian species in which the WAP gene is expressed (Sus scrofa, Canis familiaris, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus), shows a 4 aa residues (56VSSP59) insertion in the camel polypeptide chain at the beginning of the second 4-DSC domain (Fig. 1). From the Camel dromedarius gene sequence (GenBank LOC105095719) this appears to be the consequence of the usage of an unlikely intron cryptic splice site extending camel exon 3 on its 5′ side by 12-nucleotides, whereas in the other 5 species the canonic 3′ end of intron 2 is used (Fig. 5). Indeed, there are two potential intron donor splice sites responding to all requirements of splicing recognition signal: CCCGGCCAGTCTCTTCCCCAG│AGCCTGTCCTG (vertical bars materializing possible intron end recognition sites). Paradoxically it is the weakest site (CCCGGCCAG), with two purine residues (GG) interrupting the polypyrimidine tract, that is preferentially used by the splicing machinery. We confirmed this sequence, by sequencing a 580-bp fragment amplified from genomic DNA encompassing integrally exon 4 and flanking intron sequences (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Complete sequence of C. dromedarius WAP gene available in GenBank (NCBI, LOC105095719). Primer pairs used for PCR and gDNA sequencing are highlighted in green. Introns and intergenic sequences are in italics. Intron donor and acceptor sites are bolded. The effective intron donor site (GCAAG) is highlighted in fuchsia. The reading frame in WAP gene is preserved through a 2–1 exon phase (nucleotides involved at the 5′- and 3′-ends are highlighted in yellow). Triplet codons encoding aa are given in blue and encoding specific to camel WAP tetrapeptide VSSP in red. The wrong protein sequence is indicated in grey and polyA site (AATAAA) is in purple. Stop codons are indicated with *: the correct one is in blue and “algorithm” predicted is in grey

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing generates multiple protein isoforms from a single gene. Leading to a shorter or longer peptide chain, a non-allelic exon-skipping event may occur during the course of the pre-mRNA splicing. It is thought to be provoked by the weakness (unperfected complementarities between splice site signals and corresponding small ribonuclear protein particles that make up the spliceosome) in the consensus sequences, either at the 5′ and/or 3′ splice junctions or at the branch point, or both [30]. As far as camel WAP is concerned, even though cDNA sequencing allowed characterizing a single transcript we could not exclude the existence of a non-allelic short isoform of camel WAP, encoded by a shorter mRNA arising from the usage, as in the other species, of the canonic 3′ splice site (TCTCTTCCCCAG), which is indeed strongly suggested by the results of LC-MS/MS analyses.

Intron 3 of camel WAP gene is a GC-AG intron type

During the maturation process of pre-mRNA, introns are precisely removed by a large ribonucleoprotein complex: the spliceosome. This splicing step requires splice signals at the 5′ and the 3′ ends of the intron to be removed and a branch point [31]. In their vast majority, introns begin with the standard form dinucleotide GT at the 5′ splice site and terminate with the dinucleotide AG at the 3′ splice site, so-called GT-AG introns. This rule hold in most cases, however some exceptions have been found [32]. For example, at the 5′ terminus of a few introns, a dinucleotide GC can be occasionally found [33]. Based on the data sets derived from annotated gene structures, it has been reported that GC donor sites account for less than 1% of annotated donor sites and possess a strong consensus sequence [33]. GC-AG introns are processed by the same splicing pathway (U2-type spliceosome) as conventional GT-AG introns [34]. GC-AG introns works in balance with alternative GT splice donor and uses alternative donor and acceptor splice sites, and lack a reasonable poly pyrimidine tract [33]. In humans, about 0.7% of GC-AG introns are involved in regulated splicing [35]. In Caenorhabditis elegans, experiments indicate that the conserved C at the + 2 position of the tenth intron of the let-2 gene is essential for developmentally regulated alternative splicing [35]. In camel WAP gene, the C might allow the splice donor to function as a very weak splice site that works in balance with an alternative GT splice donor. In this respect, the only possibility would be the use of the GTCAC site, 7 nt upstream of the GCGAG. Such an assumption would modify the 3′ acceptor splice site of intron 3 to maintain a frame of reading in phase and to cause the loss of 3 aa residues: V and T (5′ side of intron 3) and E (3′ side of intron 3) in the camel WAP sequence. The C-terminal sequence of the protein described by Beg and co-workers [9] terminates with the peptide sequence DPVTEDSFQ. The protein sequence deduced from our cDNA sequencing, in accordance with the molecular mass determined from LC-MS, terminates with the identical DPVTEDSFQ peptide sequence. The usage of the postulated alternative GT donor splice site cannot be excluded. However, then to preserve the reading frame in phase, the upstream intron should end with the second AG (284,453/4) highlighted in yellow at Fig. 5. However, we were unable to detect a DPDSFQ C-terminal, as well in LC-MS/MS as through cDNA sequencing. Surprisingly, in WAP gene, available in GenBank (NCBI, LOC105095719) exon 3 is prolonged with 99 nucleotides encoding 33 aa residues until the occurrence of a potential TAA stop codon, which would make exon 4 ineffective. From our results, in agreement with the protein structure first reported [9] and our results, the use of this GC donor site is more than likely. Especially since it was reported that alternative GC-AG introns show a compensatory effect in terms of a dramatic increase in consensus at the donor (AG-GCAAG) as well as at the polyYx(C/T)AG-G acceptor exon positions [33].


In this study, combining proven proteomic and molecular biology approaches, three main findings in respect to camel WAP are provided. The first one is the identification of a new genetic variant (B), originating from a transition G = > A, leading to a codon change (GTG/ATG) in the nucleotide sequence of a Bactrian cDNA, which modifies a single amino acid residue at position 12 of the mature protein (V12 M). The second is the detection of two transcripts coding for camel WAP, of which the major one is arising from an improper and unusual processing of a unique pre-mRNA, due to a cryptic splice site usage. This phenomenon leads to the gain or loss of 4 amino acid residues (56VSSP59), of which one serine residue (in bold and underlined) is alternatively phosphorylated. Such a genetic polymorphism and splicing events generate a molecular sequence diversity that might account for physiochemical properties of camel WAP that would be quite different, and might contribute unique properties to camel milk. Finally, we report here the occurrence of a GC-AG intron-type (intron 3) in camel gene encoding WAP, showing a compensatory effect in terms of a dramatic increase in consensus at the acceptor exon position.



Four-disulfide cores


Amino acid


Base pair


Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry


Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry


Untranslated transcribed region


Whey acidic protein


  1. Alhaider A, Abdelgader AG, Turjoman AA, Newell K, Hunsucker SW, Shan B, et al. Through the eye of an electrospray needle: mass spectrometric identification of the major peptides and proteins in the milk of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). J Mass Spectrom. 2013;48(7):779–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hinz K, O’Connor PM, Huppertz T, Ross RP, Kelly AL. Comparison of the principal proteins in bovine, caprine, buffalo, equine and camel milk. J Dairy Res. 2012;79(02):185–91 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryskaliyeva A, Henry C, Miranda G, Faye B, Konuspayeva G, Martin P. Combining different proteomic approaches to resolve complexity of the milk protein fraction of dromedary, Bactrian camels and hybrids, from different regions of Kazakhstan. PLoS One. 2018;13(5) Available from:

  4. Konuspayeva G, Faye B, Loiseau G. The composition of camel milk: A meta-analysis of the literature data. J Food Composition Anal. 2009;22:95–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes H, Petit E, Bouniol C, Popescu P. Localization of the αS2-casein gene (CASAS2) to the homoeologous cattle, sheep, and goat chromosomes 4 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Genome Res. 1993;64(3–4):281–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Threadgill DW, Womack JE. Genomic analysis of the major bovine milk protein genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(23):6935–42 Available from:;

  7. Sharp JA, Lefèvre C, Nicholas KR. Molecular evolution of monotreme and marsupial whey acidic protein genes. Evol Dev. 2007;9(4):378–92.

  8. Hennighausen LG, Sippel AE. Mouse whey acidic protein is a novel member of the family of “four-disulfide core” proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10(8):2677–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beg OU, von Bahr-Lindstrom H, Zaidi ZH, Jornvall H. A camel milk whey protein rich in hal-cystine: primary structure, assessment of variations, internal repeat patterns, and relationships with neurophysin and other active polypeptides. Eur J Biochem. 1986;201(1):195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Devinoy E, Hubert C, Schaerer E, Houdebine LM, Kraehenbuhl JP. Sequence of the rabbit whey acidic protein cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(16):8180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranganathan S, Simpson KJ, Shaw DC, Nicholas KR. The whey acidic protein family: a new signature motif and three-dimensional structure by comparative modeling. J Mol Graph Model. 1999;17(2):106–13 134–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Topcic D, Auguste A, De Leo AA, Lefevre CM, Digby MR, Nicholas KR. Characterization of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) whey acidic protein gene: new insights into the function of the protein. Evol Dev. 2009;11(4):363–375.

  13. Demmer J, Stasiuk SJ, Grigor MR, Simpson KJ, Nicholas KR. Differential expression of the whey acidic protein gene during lactation in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Biochim Biophys Acta - Gene Struct Expr. 2001;1522(3):187–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seki M, Matsura R, Iwamori T, Nukumi N, Yamanouchi K, Kano K, et al. Identification of whey acidic protein (WAP) in dog milk. Exp Anim. 2012;61(1):67–70 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kappeler S, Farah Z, Puhan Z. 5′-flanking regions of camel Milk genes are highly similar to homologue regions of other species and can be divided into two distinct groups. J Dairy Sci. 2003;86(2):498–508 Available from:

  16. Grabowski H, Le Bars D, Chene N, Attal J, Malienou-Ngassa R, Puissant C, et al. Rabbit whey acidic protein concentration in milk, serum, mammary gland extract, and culture medium. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(12):4143–50 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin CQ, Dempsey PJ, Coffey RJ, Bissell MJ. Extracellular matrix regulates whey acidic protein gene expression by suppression of TGF-alpha in mouse mammary epithelial cells: studies in culture and in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol. 1995;129(4):1115–26 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Devinoy E, Thepot D, Stinnakre MG, Fontaine ML, Grabowski H, Puissant C, et al. High level production of human growth hormone in the milk of transgenic mice: the upstream region of the rabbit whey acidic protein (WAP) gene targets transgene expression to the mammary gland. Transgenic Res. 1994;3(2):79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin P, Cebo C, Miranda G. Interspecies comparison of milk proteins: Quantitative variability and molecular diversity. In: Advanced Dairy Chemistry: Volume 1A: Proteins: Basic Aspects, 4th Edition; 2013. p. 387–429.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hajjoubi S, Rival-Gervier S, Hayes H, Floriot S, Eggen A, Piumi F, et al. Ruminants genome no longer contains whey acidic protein gene but only a pseudogene. Gene. 2006;370(1–2):104–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith VJ. Phylogeny of whey acidic protein (WAP) four-disulfide core proteins and their role in lower vertebrates and invertebrates. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39(5):1403–8 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Simpson KJ, Nicholas KR. The comparative biology of whey proteins. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2002;7:313–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nukumi N, Iwamori T, Kano K, Naito K, Tojo H. Whey acidic protein (WAP) regulates the proliferation of mammary epithelial cells by preventing serine protease from degrading laminin. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(3):793–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iwamori T, Nukumi N, Itoh K, Kano K, Naito K, Kurohmaru M, et al. Bacteriostatic activity of whey acidic protein (WAP). J Vet Med Sci. 2010;72(5):621–5 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watt AP, Sharp JA, Lefevre C, Nicholas KR. WFDC2 is differentially expressed in the mammary gland of the tammar wallaby and provides immune protection to the mammary gland and the developing pouch young. Dev Comp Immunol. 2012;36(3):584–590.

  26. Brenaut P, Bangera R, Bevilacqua C, Rebours E, Cebo C, Martin P. Validation of RNA isolated from milk fat globules to profile mammary epithelial cell expression during lactation and transcriptional response to a bacterial infection. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95(10):6130–44 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–85.

  28. Saadaoui B, Bianchi L, Henry C, Miranda G, Martin P, Cebo C. Combining proteomic tools to characterize the protein fraction of llama (Lama glama) milk. Electrophoresis. 2014;35(10):1406–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dandekar AM, Robinson EA, Appella E, Qasba PK. Complete sequence analysis of cDNA clones encoding rat whey phosphoprotein: homology to a protease inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(13):3987–991.

  30. Martin P, Szymanowska M, Zwierzchowski L, Leroux C. The impact of genetic polymorphisms on the protein composition of ruminant milks. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002;42(5):433–59 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Burge CB, Tuschl T, Sharp PA. Splicing of Precursors to mRNAs by the Spliceosomes. In: The RNA World; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu Q, Krainer AR. AT-AC pre-mRNA splicing mechanisms and conservation of minor introns in voltage-gated ion channel genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(5):3225–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Thanaraj TA, Clark F. Human GC-AG alternative intron isoforms with weak donor sites show enhanced consensus at acceptor exon positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(12):2581–93 Available from:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aebi M, Hornig H, Weissmann C. 5′ cleavage site in eukaryotic pre-mRNA splicing is determined by the overall 5′ splice region, not by the conserved 5′ GU. Cell. 1987;50(2):237–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Farrer T, Roller AB, Kent WJ, Zahler AM. Analysis of the role of Caenorhabditis elegans GC-AG introns in regulated splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(15):3360–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank all Kazakhstani camel milk farms, as well as Moldir Nurseitova and Ali Totaev from the scientific and production company “Antigen” for rendering help in sample collection. We also acknowledge PAPPSO and @BRIDGe teams at INRA (Jouy-en-Josas, France) for providing necessary facilities and technical support.


The study was carried out within the Bolashak International Scholarship of the first author, funded by the JSC «Center for International Programs» (Kazakhstan). This work was supported in part by the grant for Scientific Research Project named “Proteomic investigation of exosomes from milk of Camelus bactrianus and Camelus dromedarius” #AP05134760 from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which is duly appreciated. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The additional datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AR carried out the study, collected milk samples, performed the experiments, and interpreted the data. CH and GM have made substantial contribution to performing LC-MS/MS and LC-ESI-MS analysis, respectively, and to acquisition and interpretation of data. BF and GK have made substantial contribution to conception and design of the study, co-supervised the research and provided funding. PM has made substantial contribution to conception and design of the study, conceived and supervised the research, interpreted the data. AR and PM have been involved in writing and drafting the manuscript and revising it. Each author has contributed towards the article and given final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrice Martin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local ethics committee ruled out that no specific permission or formal ethics approval were required for this study with the exception of the rules of European Community regulations on animal experimentation (European Communities Council Directive 86/609/EEC). All animal studies were strictly carried out in compliance with European Community regulations on animal experimentation and with the authorization of the Kazakh Ministry of Agriculture. Milk and blood sampling were performed in appropriate conditions supervised by a veterinary accredited by the French Ethics National Committee for Experimentation on Living Animals.

A verbal informed consent, approved by the local ethics committee, was obtained from the camels owners. No endangered or protected animal species were involved in this study.

Consent for publication

The camels’ owners are willing to publish the results of our study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryskaliyeva, A., Henry, C., Miranda, G. et al. The main WAP isoform usually found in camel milk arises from the usage of an improbable intron cryptic splice site in the precursor to mRNA in which a GC-AG intron occurs. BMC Genet 20, 14 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: