Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of the mapping analysis based on the repeatability model with the simple analysis using the mean phenotype under the conditions of different the variance ratios of permanent environmental effects to random environmental effects

From: Mapping quantitative trait loci in line cross with repeat records

    Estimate
h2 σ p 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacqWFdpWCdaqhaaWcbaGaemiCaahabaGaeGOmaidaaaaa@30FE@ : σ ε 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacqWFdpWCdaqhaaWcbaGae8xTdugabaGaeGOmaidaaaaa@3137@ Method Power Position a d h 2 σ p 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacqWFdpWCdaqhaaWcbaGaemiCaahabaGaeGOmaidaaaaa@30FE@ σ ε 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaaiiGacqWFdpWCdaqhaaWcbaGae8xTdugabaGaeGOmaidaaaaa@3137@ or σ2 LOD
0.05 1: 4 Repeat 72 25.59(0.919) 0.471(0.021) 0.494(0.013) 0.076(0.003) 0.889(0.022) 4.080(0.025) 17.27(0.484)
   Mean 60 25.52(0.870) 0.491(0.024) 0.507(0.015) 0.199(0.006)   1.711(0.234) 19.68(0.525)
  2: 3 Repeat 44 27.59(1.662) 0.544(0.032) 0.540(0.022) 0.098(0.006) 1.776(0.039) 3.023(0.024) 15.79(0.495)
   Mean 42 26.47(1.415) 0.549(0.030) 0.527(0.027) 0.177(0.006)   2.418(0.039) 17.39(0.500)
  3: 2 Repeat 38 24.97(1.441) 0.607(0.034) 0.576(0.023) 0.110(0.004) 2.745(0.060) 2.048(0.018) 14.54(0.389)
   Mean 37 25.76(1.456) 0.601(0.034) 0.585(0.026) 0.162(0.006)   3.158(0.054) 16.16(0.452)
  4: 1 Repeat 33 30.57(2.141) 0.668(0.050) 0.558(0.035) 0.128(0.063) 3.604(0.067) 1.007(0.010) 14.04(0.437)
   Mean 26 30.62(2.321) 0.717(0.051) 0.598(0.043) 0.171(0.007)   3.694(0.071) 16.74(0.570)
0.10 1: 4 Repeat 97 25.01(0.408) 0.643(0.019) 0.622(0.013) 0.115(0.036) 0.917(0.023) 4.042(0.019) 25.05(0.586)
   Mean 94 24.93(0.411) 0.648(0.020) 0.628(0.013) 0.267(0.007)   1.765(0.023) 26.56(0.600)
  2: 3 Repeat 86 26.32(0.815) 0.667(0.022) 0.635(0.014) 0.122(0.033) 1.890(0.030) 3.085(0.015) 19.28(0.440)
   Mean 84 26.34(0.827) 0.669(0.023) 0.643(0.014) 0.215(0.054)   2.518(0.029) 20.80(0.459)
  3: 2 Repeat 83 25.53(0.612) 0.655(0.028) 0.679(0.017) 0.137(0.004) 2.718(0.035) 2.079(0.013) 17.76(0.422)
   Mean 83 25.73(0.750) 0.659(0.029) 0.689(0.018) 0.199(0.006)   3.145(0.033) 19.37(0.451)
  4: 1 Repeat 64 25.14(1.043) 0.703(0.029) 0.686(0.018) 0.143(0.004) 3.812(0.051) 1.007(0.007) 16.27(0.430)
   Mean 61 25.44(0.997) 0.725(0.032) 0.751(0.022) 0.192(0.006)   3.898(0.051) 18.32(0.437)
  1. h2 is the proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL. There are 100 individuals each with five records. Standard deviations are in parentheses.