| | |
Number of markers1
|
|---|
| |
α
2
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
11
|
|---|
|
Power3 (%)
|
0.05
|
62.2
|
91.6
|
94.4
|
96.5
|
97.5
|
| |
0.01
|
37.2
|
79.0
|
85.2
|
88.9
|
91.8
|
|
RMSE4 (cM)
|
-
|
16.6
|
10.5
|
8.8
|
7.4
|
5.7
|
| |
0.05
|
14.9
|
10.1
|
8.4
|
7.2
|
5.6
|
| |
0.01
|
14.1
|
9.7
|
8.0
|
6.9
|
5.2
|
|
Proportion5 (%)
|
-
|
19.0
|
15.4
|
12.5
|
11.8
|
35.0
|
| |
0.05
|
13.0
|
14.6
|
11.5
|
11.5
|
34.5
|
| |
0.01
|
10.8
|
13.7
|
10.7
|
10.5
|
34.0
|
- 1The markers were evenly located in a linkage group of 0.6 M.
- 2Significance level for the LRT.
- 3Power of the QTL detection at significance level α in a population of 300 progeny.
- 4RMSE of the estimated QTL location, the true QTL being located at 0.07 M on a 0.6 M linkage group.
- 5Proportion of QTL located at a marker location.
