Test Sample ID | Test Sample | Capture Method | Sample Size | a) Allocation to river of capture | b) Assignment to river of capture | c) Allocation to pooled river of capture | d) Assignment to pooled river of capture | e) Allocation to region of capture | f) Assignment to region of origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | Lune (2004-05) | Estuary Net | 49 | 26.70 (2.17, 34.35) | 28.57 (0.79, 0.48-0.98) | 49.41 (12.8, 55.9) | 53.01 (0.87, 0.51-1.00) | 77.72 (45.53, 81.91) | 81.63 (0.93, 0.53-1.00) |
T2 | Ribble 2004 | Estuary Net | 50 | 20.96 (1.64, 29.30) | 22.00 (0.86, 0.59-1.00) | 37.94 (3.2, 42.3) | 40.00 (0.83, 0.48-1.00) | 80.39 (45.86, 83.39) | 82.00 (0.96, 0.56-1.00) |
T3 | Dee (1984-88) | Estuary Net | 47 | 8.30 (0.00, 18.47) | 8.51 (0.84, 0.55-1.00) | 15.02 (0.0, 27.2) | 17.02 (0.72, 0.34-1.00) | 34.81 (18.11, 58.01) | 34.04 (0.89, 0.55-1.00) |
T4 | Tamar 1987 | Estuary Net | 62 | 41.66 (11.03, 47.89) | 41.94 (0.85, 0.28-1.00) | 57.08 (25.1, 64.7) | 65.08 (0.85, 0.39-1.00) | 77.22 (48.23, 81.76) | 80.65 (0.93, 0.53-1.00) |
T5 | Mudeford 2006 | Estuary Net | 47 | 81.24 (42.15, 89.13) | 93.30 (0.79, 0.52-1.00) | 88.50 (57.2, 95.9) | 89.36 (0.96, 0.57-1.00) | 98.47 (91.61, 1.00) | 97.87 (1.00, 0.96-1.00) |
T6 | Aven+ 2005 | Rod Caught | 37 | 42.78 (8.0, 61.0) | 40.54 (0.90, 0.52-1.00) | 43.12 (8.3, 60.0) | 40.54 (0.89, 0.52-1.00) | 92.00 (75.18, 98.60) | 91.89 (1.00, 0.98-1.00) |
T7 | Narcea 2006 | Rod Caught | 112 | 37.25 (22.7, 51.9) | 39.29 (0.86, 0.51-1.00) | 28.73 (14.3, 42.0) | 28.57 (0.85, 0.47-0.99) | 97.04 (91.02, 99.55) | 96.43 (1.00, 0.97-1.00) |
Mean | Â | Â | Â | 36.98 | 39.16 | 45.69 | 47.65 | 79.66 | 80.64 |