Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality control of the clean data

From: Identification and characterization of cherry (Cerasus pseudocerasus G. Don) genes responding to parthenocarpy induced by GA3 through transcriptome analysis

Sample Raw of Number Clean read% Remove Adapter % Ns Reads Rate % Low quality % Clean Q30 Bases Rate (%) Mapping Rate % Exon % Intron % Intergenic %
CK11 45,723,590 99.27 0.7 0.02 0 92.87 83 81.2 9.01 9.8
CK12 45,297,964 98.82 1.16 0.02 0 92.77 80 81.51 8.38 10.12
CK13 46,636,712 99.25 0.73 0.02 0 92.37 86 82.23 8.46 9.31
CK21 44,993,708 99.14 0.84 0.02 0 92.39 85 81.04 9.16 9.81
CK22 44,432,270 99.28 0.7 8.55E–05 0.02 91.63 84 80.06 10.15 9.79
CK23 45,263,166 99.06 0.91 0.02 0 92.17 82 81.5 9.04 9.46
T11 45,225,288 99.07 0.91 0.02 0 92.41 82 81.03 9.22 9.75
T12 47,694,260 98.96 1.02 0.02 0 92.13 86 82.08 8.45 9.47
T13 47,760,684 99.29 0.68 0 0.03 89.68 81 79.47 10.21 10.33
T21 45,251,876 99.11 0.87 0.02 0 92.46 76 81.01 9.35 9.64
T22 47,477,702 98.99 0.98 0.02 0 92.32 83 81 9.15 9.85
T23 45,849,530 99.21 0.77 0.02 0 92.38 80 81.66 8.86 9.48
  1. The Ns reads rate indicates that N is too high; the number of sequences that have been removed accounts for the proportion of the original sequence number
  2. Intergenic: new transcripts, expression noise, etc., result in sequences derived from intergenic regions
  3. CK1 control groups without GA treatment in the anthesis stage
  4. CK2 control groups without GA treatment in the hard nucleus stage
  5. T1 GA treatment groups in the anthesis stage
  6. T2 GA treatment groups in the hard-nucleus stage