Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of all sampled Impatiens glandulifera populations

From: No genetic erosion after five generations for Impatiens glandulifera populations across the invaded range in Europe

Study region/ Population

Lat (°N)

Lon (°E)

Ne

2011

2016

pop size

A

HE

HO

FIS

%P

pop size

A

HE

HO

FIS

%P

North France

 Amiens 1a

49.922

2.229

8.5

500–1000

1.4

0.19

0.12

0.368**

44.4

200–500

1.6

0.13

0.15

−0.131

44.4

 Amiens 2a

50.014

2.036

5.6

500–1000

1.7

0.15

0.17

−0.106

55.6

100–200

1.7

0.16

0.16

−0.017

44.4

Belgium

 Ghent 1a

51.010

3.794

89.0

> 1000

1.9

0.25

0.20

0.216**

77.8

> 1000

1.8

0.26

0.25

0.094

77.8

 Ghent 2b

50.884

3.929

52.7

> 1000

1.2

0.11

0.10

0.076

22.2

200–500

1.8

0.16

0.13

0.227*

55.6

Germany

 Bremen 1a

53.130

8.786

32.0

> 1000

2.2

0.25

0.26

−0.019

77.8

100–200

1.9

0.24

0.25

−0.023

66.7

 Bremen 2b

53.164

8.753

162.2

> 1000

1.7

0.22

0.25

−0.128

55.6

500–1000

1.8

0.21

0.25

−0.172

66.7

South Sweden

 Lund 1a

55.994

12.800

13.3

100–200

2.1

0.14

0.09

0.380***

66.7

50–100

1.8

0.17

0.16

0.124(*)

66.7

 Lund 2a

55.977

12.820

4.7

500–1000

2.1

0.21

0.15

0.315***

77.8

200–500

1.9

0.13

0.07

0.490***

77.8

Central Sweden

 Stockholm 1a

59.163

18.168

35.7

200–500

2.0

0.26

0.24

0.128(*)

66.7

100–200

2.1

0.24

0.19

0.237**

77.8

 Stockholm 2b

59.409

17.860

41.9

500–1000

1.8

0.16

0.18

−0.136

55.6

200–500

1.7

0.17

0.20

−0.101

66.7

Central Norway

 Trondheim 1a

63.479

10.999

56.9

> 1000

1.8

0.23

0.17

0.285**

77.8

200–500

2.0

0.28

0.19

0.389***

88.9

 Trondheim 2a

63.477

10.964

10.5

> 1000

1.1

0.09

0.12

−0.420

22.2

200–500

1.4

0.14

0.16

−0.090

44.4

 Trondheim 3a

63.413

10.809

4.2

< 50

1.8

0.18

0.14

0.302**

66.7

50–100

1.6

0.17

0.21

−0.215

44.4

  1. Information about location, effective population size (Ne), actual population size (number of individuals), mean number of alleles (A), expected heterozygosity (HE), observed heterozygosity (HO), inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and percentage of polymorphism (%P) for each population in both the 2011 and 2016 sampling year. Significance: (*): 0.10 ≥ P-value > 0.05; *: 0.05 ≥ P-value > 0.01; **: 0.01 ≥ P-value > 0.001; ***: 0.001 ≥ P-value
  2. a2011 population information originates from the Hagenblad et al. [7] study
  3. b2011 population information obtained from new genetic analyses on stored leaf material