Skip to main content

Table 3 Empirical power at the 0.05 significance level for Ω0 + II in the homogenous population

From: Rare variant association analysis in case-parents studies by allowing for missing parental genotypes

 

Causal variants have different effects with the same direction

Causal variants have opposite effects

Non-causal variants

Sample size (N)a

\( {TDT}_{\mathrm{BRV}} \)

\( {\tilde{Z}}_C \)

\( {TDT}_{\mathrm{BRV}} \)

\( {\tilde{Z}}_C \)

80%

N0

0.602

0.408

0.226

0.140

+ \( \frac{1}{10} \) N0

0.702(16.6%)

0.551(35.1%)

0.269(19.0%)

0.218(55.7%)

+ \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0

0.732(21.6%)

0.660(61.8%)

0.278(23.0%)

0.241(72.1%)

+ \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0

0.770(27.9%)

0.745(82.6%)

0.309(36.7%)

0.300(114%)

60%

N0

0.828

0.776

0.364

0.164

+ \( \frac{1}{10} \) N0

0.920(9.20%)

0.911(17.4%)

0.454(24.7%)

0.310(89.0%)

+ \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0

0.941(13.6%)

0.936(20.6%)

0.482(32.4%)

0.406(147%)

+ \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0

0.963(16.3%)

0.960(23.7%)

0.575(58.0%)

0.542(230%)

40%

N0

1.00

0.980

0.264

0.178

+ \( \frac{1}{10} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.277(4.92%)

0.231(29.8%)

+ \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.300(13.6%)

0.286(60.7%)

+ \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.348(31.8%)

0.339(90.4%)

20%

N0

1.00

1.00

0.278

0.166

+ \( \frac{1}{10} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.289(3.96%)

0.204(22.9%)

+ \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.310(11.5%)

0.262(57.8%)

+ \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0

1.00

1.00

0.368(32.4%)

0.320(92.8%)

  1. Note: aThe sample size N = N0 + NII, denoted by +\( \frac{1}{10} \) N0, + \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0, and + \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0, where there are N0 (=500) complete case-parents trios (Ω0) and NII case-parents trios of ΩII with NII = \( \frac{1}{10} \) N0, \( \frac{1}{5} \) N0, and \( \frac{1}{2} \) N0, respectively. Shown in parentheses is the proportion of power improvement