Skip to main content

Table 3 Positions and effects of significant QTL for carcass and meat quality traits in the cross between GG and NZW rabbits

From: A comprehensive linkage map and QTL map for carcass traits in a cross between Giant Grey and New Zealand White rabbits

OCU/LG

Trait

Model 1

cM 2 (Mb)

Flanking markers 3

95% CI 4

F-value 5

a (SE) 6

d (SE) 7

VF 2 % 8

    

Left or direct

Right

(cM)

    

2

Hind part weight (g)

2

0.0 (29.01)

INRACCDDV0192

 

0.0- 18.0

10.10**

5.82 (1.30)

0.82 (1.86)

5.96

3

Bone weight fore part (g)

2

90.0 (131.74)

Sat3

INRACCDDV0203

28.5- 90.0

9.11*

4.45 (1.39)

-6.33 (2.12)

6.03

7

Kidney weight (g)

1

90.0 (155.45)

D7Utr4

D7L1B10

20.0 97.0

8.36*

0.84 (0.21)

0.19 (0.31)

4.97

7

Hot carcass weight (g)

1

91.0 (157.34)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

5.0- 98.0

11.02**

64.83 (14.78)

36.34 (22.10)

6.46

7

Reference carcass weight (g)

1

91.0 (157.34)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

5.0- 98.0

11.34**

63.70 (14.45)

38.50 (21.62)

6.64

7

Fore part weight (g)

1

91.0 (157.34)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

3.0- 98.0

8.69*

23.86 (6.16)

13.94 (9.21)

5.17

7

Intermediate part weight (g)

1

91.0 (157.34)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

62.0- 98.0

13.06**

17.66 (3.76)

11.21 (5.62)

7.57

7

Hind part weight (g)

1

92.0 (157.45)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

3.0- 98.0

9.95*

21.58 (5.18)

11.84 (7.68)

5.87

7

Meat weight fore part (g)

1

92.0 (157.45)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

4.0- 98.0

8.67*

20.34 (5.42)

13.08 (8.05)

5.75

7

Meat weight intermediate part (g)

1

92.0 (157.45)

D7L1B10

INRACCDDV0092

15.5- 98.0

11.49**

13.91 (3.21)

8.69 (4.78)

7.46

7

Meat weight hind part (g)

1

93.0 (158.19)

INRACCDDV0092

D7Utr5

3.0- 98.0

9.35*

18.72 (4.62)

8.92 (6.88)

6.16

9

Bone weight fore part (g)

1

61.0 (65.57)

INRACCDDV0010

INRACCDDV0146

35.0- 98.5

8.94*

7.10 (1.74)

-1.83 (2.50)

5.92

12

Drip loss (%)

1

94.0 (127.58)

INRACCDDV0201

INRACCDDV0176

0.0- 94.0

8.16*

-0.29 (0.10)

-0.58 (0.19)

4.87

19

Hind part weight (g)

2

45.0 (48.44)

INRACCDDV0071

INRACCDDV0193

28.5- 67.0

8.52*

3.23 (1.36)

6.87 (2.18)

5.07

  1. 1Model 1-standard QTL model with covariate birthweight; Model 2-standard QTL model with covariate reference carcass weight, 2Chromosomal location is given as pedigree-specific cM position; first marker on each chromosome was set at 0 cM. Estimated physical position between the flanking markers in Mb is given in parentheses; 3Flanking markers (left or direct and right) of the QTL peak; 4CI-confidence interval; 5F-value is F-statistic for QTL using standard one QTL model; 6a-additive effect; 7d-dominance effect; the direction of additive and dominance effects is given as GG-allele effect compared to NZW, bold values indicate significant effects if the estimate divided by the standard error > 1.96; 8phenotypic F2 variance (%) explained by the QTL; **highly significant at 1% genome-wide level (F-value ≥ 10.0), *significant at 5% genome-wide level (F-value ≥ 8.10); pH45 - pH value 45 min post mortem, pH24 - pH value 24 h post mortem, meat colour45 L*, a*, b* - meat colour traits lightness, redness, yellowness 45 min post mortem, meat colour24 L*, a*, b*- meat colour traits lightness, redness, yellowness 24 h post mortem.
Back to article page

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us