Skip to main content

Table 3 Outbred F2 QTL analyses using a 1-QTL model.

From: Fine-mapping of a QTL influencing pork tenderness on porcine chromosome 2

F1 Boara

No. of Full-Sib Families

Total No. of Offspring

Traitb

QTL Position (cM)

F-Test Statisticc

Likelihood Ratio

LOD

Additive Effect

S.E.d

Dominance Effect

S.E.e

95% C.I. of QTL Positionf (cM)

Length of C.I. (cM)

IMQP

86

801

Shear

25

**26.07

50.47

10.96

-0.21

0.03

-0.05

0.04

13.0 – 39.0

26.0

IMQP

86

801

Tender

24

**23.57

45.78

9.94

0.57

0.08

0.06

0.12

14.0 – 37.0

23.0

108110

13

141

Shear

8

**10.75

19.85

4.31

-0.43

0.10

-0.24

0.16

0.0 – 43.0

43.0

108110

13

141

Tender

17

**19.70

34.29

7.45

1.31

0.22

0.40

0.32

10.0 – 43.0

33.0

108120

16

158

Shear

29

**8.22

15.59

3.39

-0.24

0.06

-0.06

0.09

21.5 – 77.0

55.5

108120

16

158

Tender

28

**10.40

19.46

4.23

0.72

0.17

0.39

0.24

22.0 – 38.0

16.0

207050

18

126

Shear

28

4.31

8.31

1.81

-0.17

0.06

-0.04

0.08

0.0 – 78.0

78.0

207050

18

126

Tender

3

4.13

7.98

1.73

0.48

0.21

-0.61

0.30

0.0 – 77.5

77.5

207061

10

110

Shear

22

**10.51

19.03

4.13

-0.26

0.07

-0.23

0.11

14.5 – 46.0

31.5

207061

10

110

Tender

28

*6.18

11.64

2.53

0.63

0.18

-0.09

0.28

7.5 – 76.0

68.5

308102

11

105

Shear

44

0.98

1.94

0.42

-0.01

0.08

-0.16

0.11

0.0 – 78.0

78.0

308102

11

105

Tender

47

1.74

3.41

0.74

0.12

0.27

0.68

0.37

0.0 – 75.0

75.0

309050

17

148

Shear

23

4.59

8.89

1.93

-0.16

0.05

-0.01

0.08

1.0 – 78.0

77.0

309050

17

148

Tender

33

4.93

9.51

2.07

0.50

0.18

0.44

0.27

0.0 – 53.5

53.5

108120, 207061

26

268

Shear

29

**13.54

25.72

5.59

-0.22

0.05

-0.12

0.07

18.0 – 54.0

36.0

108120, 207061

26

268

Tender

28

**13.53

25.71

5.58

0.64

0.13

0.18

0.19

22.0 – 29.0

7.0

108120, 207061g

26

268

Shear

54

*5.97

11.66

2.53

0.03

0.05

0.26

0.07

0.0 – 57.0

57.0

108120, 207061g

26

268

Tender

78

1.74

3.45

0.75

-0.05

0.14

0.35

0.19

0.0 – 78.0

78.0

  1. aIMQP indicates all animals of the Illinois Meat Quality Pedigree analyzed in this study.
  2. bShear and Tender denote Instron Shear Force and Taste Panel Tenderness, respectively.
  3. cValues significant at the p = 0.05 and p = 0.01 levels, as determined by chromosome-wise permutation (n = 5,000), are indicated with one and two asterisks, respectively.
  4. dDenotes standard error associated with additive effects.
  5. eDenotes standard error associated with dominance effects.
  6. fConfidence interval as determined by bootstrapping (n = 1,000).
  7. gIncludes CAST as a fixed genetic effect.