Skip to main content

Table 3 Evidence for QTL significant at the 5% chromosome-wide level for traits related to muscle fibre distribution by chromosome obtained by F2 analysis. Estimated significance levels (F-value), position, % of F2 variance explained by each QTL, and gene effects.

From: QTL for microstructural and biophysical muscle properties and body composition in pigs

Trait

SSC

Position [cM]

F- Value

% Variance1

Additive

 

Dominance

 
     

Effect2

S.E.

Effect2

S.E.

DiaAnF

1

3

8.4***

11.8

2.64

1.39

-7.04

1.80

ProSTO

1

93

5.5*

10.4

-0.99

1.45

12.97

3.99

DiaFTG

1

114

5.0*

9.5

-5.86

2.53

11.77

5.47

DiaFTG

2

63

9.4***

17.8

-7.40

1.90

-10.07

5.91

DiaFTO

2

63

4.7*

8.8

-4.86

1.68

-4.86

5.06

Diamean

2

66

9.5***

17.9

-7.04

1.78

-8.85

5.58

ToF#

2

141

5.9*

4.9

-78.2

23.7

37.5

37.7

Fib/mm2

2

145

6.3*

4.4

-34.0

9.7

67.8

14.3

ProGiF

3

0

6.0*

11.2

0.03

0.02

-0.09

0.03

Fib/mm2

3

37

6.9**

3.7

-51.5

14.1

-36.9

27.2

CapSTO

3

57

5.7*

10.7

0.07

0.07

0.34

0.11

ProFTG

4

18

6.4*

10.7

-2.47

1.35

-5.76

2.58

ProFTG/w

4

26

7.8**

5.7

-2.98

0.77

-1.00

1.57

Prow

4

33

5.9*

9.3

-2.66

0.97

2.93

1.73

DiaFTG/w

4

79

4.9*

3.2

2.38

1.56

5.54

3.04

Fib/mm2

4

96

5.4*

10.2

4.11

15.11

-53.30

17.83

Diamean

4

96

7.6**

14.2

0.08

1.89

7.52

2.23

DiaFTG

4

96

8.6***

16.3

0.57

2.14

8.82

2.53

Diared

5

0

6.4*

10.2

1.52

2.08

-8.85

3.45

Diared

7

168

5.6*

8.9

2.67

0.93

2.89

1.43

DiaSTO

9

108

4.3*

8.0

2.84

0.99

0.37

1.36

Capmean

10

54

5.2*

9.8

-0.07

0.05

-0.32

-0.19

CapSTO

10

57

6.4**

12.1

-0.21

0.08

-0.49

0.18

Proim

11

21

4.2*

6.7

1.79

0.67

0.84

1.26

ProAnF

11

69

4.9*

9.2

0.01

0.14

-0.90

0.29

Fib/mm2

12

90

4.3*

6.8

-40.1

16.9

-40.5

24.6

Diared

12

90

5.6*

8.9

2.89

1.07

3.03

1.57

ToF#

12

92

6.0**

9.7

-92.3

32.8

-92.1

45.1

DiaSTO/red

12

92

4.6*

3.0

1.85

0.72

1.71

0.98

Prored

14

51

7.3**

11.6

-3.87

1.23

3.11

1.99

Prow

14

54

4.3*

6.6

1.78

1.14

-3.72

1.74

ProSTO/red

14

54

6.1*

4.2

-1.99

0.71

1.61

1.20

Fib/mm2

14

93

4.9*

7.9

-24.8

28.6

20.0

69.4

ToF#

14

98

7.6**

12.4

-19.9

54.2

461.3

120.6

Diaim

14

102

4.2*

6.8

-0.57

1.95

-11.89

4.09

Diaw

14

102

7.9***

12.7

1.60

1.96

-15.65

4.09

ToF#

15

56

5.7*

10.8

-98.3

29.0

-7.1

66.9

ProAnF

15

57

5.7*

9.2

0.01

0.22

-1.66

0.51

DiaGiF

15

69

5.7**

9.1

21.66

7.11

21.37

14.11

DiaSTO

15

81

5.4*

10.2

3.15

1.06

-1.98

1.64

DiaFTO

15

84

5.8**

11.0

2.70

1.08

-3.48

1.58

ProGiF

16

93

4.5*

8.5

-0.05

0.02

-0.04

0.03

Diamean

18

0

4.5*

8.5

-2.94

1.02

-1.72

1.56

DiaSTO

18

0

5.6*

10.6

-2.87

0.88

-1.33

1.34

DiaFTO

18

0

4.7*

8.9

-2.47

0.96

-2.74

1.47

DiaSTO/red

18

0

4.8*

3.2

-2.00

0.68

-1.24

0.99

ProGiF

18

48

5.5*

10.4

-0.06

0.03

-0.13

0.05

  1. *: significant at the 5% chromosome-wide level, **: significant at the 1% chromosome-wide level, ***: significant at the 5% genome-wide level
  2. 1the fraction of phenotypic variance in the F2 explained by a QTL; calculated as the proportion of residual variance of the statistical models with and without the QTL effect
  3. 2positive values of additive genetic and dominance effects imply higher trait values forced by the Duroc allele;
Back to article page

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us