TY - JOUR AU - Thalamuthu, Anbupalam AU - Mukhopadhyay, Indranil AU - Ray, Amrita AU - Weeks, Daniel E. PY - 2005 DA - 2005/12/30 TI - A comparison between microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism markers with respect to two measures of information content JO - BMC Genetics SP - S27 VL - 6 IS - 1 AB - Using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 (GAW14) simulated dataset, we compare microsatellite and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in terms of two measures of information content, the traditional entropy-based information content measure, and a new "relative information" measure. Both attempt to measure the amount of information contained in the markers about the identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing among relatives. The performance of the two information measures are compared based on their variability and ability to predict change in the LOD score (ΔLOD) as map density increases for SNP markers. Although in a linked region, LOD scores are correlated with measures of information, we observe that none of the measures predict the LOD score itself very well. In an unlinked region, the LOD score is not related to either measures of information. The information content of microsatellite markers with 7.5-cM spacing is slightly higher than that of SNP markers with 3-cM spacing. At these map densities, microsatellites are found to be uniformly more informative than SNPs irrespective of their level of heterozygosity. For SNPs, we found that as the level of heterozygosity increases, the information content increases. As reported in all other previous studies, we also found that high-density SNPs have higher information content compared to low-density microsatellites. Performance of both the two information measures considered here are similar, but the relative information measure predicts ΔLOD as marker density increases better than the traditional entropy-based information measure. SN - 1471-2156 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S27 DO - 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S27 ID - Thalamuthu2005 ER -