Skip to main content

Table 2 P for AI, DA, KA, NY and combined populations

From: Performance comparison of two-point linkage methods using microsatellite markers flanking known disease locations

   MMLS MLS KCLS MOD PPL PPL-p PPL-seq
AI         
  D1 60% a 30% 40% 54% 57%   
  D2 78% 76% 72% 75% 77%   
  D3 61% 70% 69% 62% 65%   
  D4 70% 67% 55% 67% 68%   
  D5 2% 3% 3% 2% 4%   
  D6 2% 1% 2% 1% 3%   
DA         
  D1 97% 98% 98% 99% 100%   
  D2 76% 89% 90% 89% 90%   
  D3 4% 8% 10% 10% 15%   
  D4 6% 13% a 7% 11% 11%   
  D5 4% 7% 7% 6% 6%   
  D6 2% 2% 1% 4% 5%   
KA         
  D1 20% a 16% 15% 20% 16%   
  D2 54% 58% 49% 48% 45%   
  D3 77% 93% 89% 88% 83%   
  D4 89% 89% 83% 93% 86%   
  D5 4% 4% 1% 4% 3%   
  D6 1% 2% 3% 1% 1%   
NY         
  D1 6% 2% 8% 3% 15%   
  D2 32% 31% 43% 25% 61%   
  D3 4% 7% 28% 2% 24%   
  D4 0% 6% 10% 0% 2%   
  D5 0% a 0% 0% 0% 0%   
  D6 0% 1% 0% 0% 0%   
Combined         
  D1 97% 95% 98% 97%   96% 100%
  D2 100% a 100% 100% 100%   100% 100%
  D3 90% 99% 100% 97%   95% 98%
  D4 91% 99% 97% 92%   89% 95%
  D5 1% 5% 2% 1%   1% 4%
  D6 1% 2% 1% 0%   0% 0%
  1. aBold text indicates the method receiving the highest score at each population/locus.