Skip to main content

Table 5 QTL identified under upland drought-stress conditions in two populations

From: Identification and mapping of stable QTL with main and epistasis effect on rice grain yield under upland drought stress

Trait

QTL

Year

Flanking markers

Position (cM)

Additive effect (%)

F value

R2(%)

Kali Aus/2*MTU1010

GY

qDTY 1.2

2012 DS RS

RM259–RM315

50.2

17

9.0

6.3%

  

2013 DS RS

 

50.2

19

8.2

4.5%

  

Combined stress

 

50.2

19

11.6

7.1%

 

qDTY 2.2

2012 DS RS

RM211–RM263

72.2

21

9.3

6.2%

  

2013 DS RS

 

72.9

30

10.9

6.0%

  

Combined stress

 

72.9

24

8.6

5.8%

DTF

qDTF 2.2

2012 DS RS

RM211–RM263

72.9

−3.8

8.4

4.5%

  

2013 DS RS

 

73.9

−4.0

7.7

4.0%

  

Combined stress

 

72.9

−3.7

12.3

7.8%

PH

qPH 1.1

2012 DS RS

RM315–RM431

144.0

2.0

7.5

4.6%

  

2013 DS RS

 

145.0

4.2

16.8

8.3%

  

Combined stress

 

144.0

2.5

17.1

9.1%

Kali Aus/2*IR64

GY

qDTY 1.3

2012 DS RS

RM488–RM315

109.2

14

9.0

6.5%

  

2013 DS RS

 

108.2

18

7.0

7.7%

  

Combined stress

 

110.2

15

8.9

5.3%

 

qDTY 2.3

2012 DS RS

RM263–RM573

106.2

10

7.7

5.0%

  

2013 DS RS

 

107.4

11

5.2

4.8%

  

Combined stress

 

106.4

11

9.7

7.4%

  

2012 DS NS

RM263–RM573

108.4

8.3

8.0

4.3%

  

2013 DS NS

 

108.6

12

5.4

4.0%

  

Combined non-stress

 

108.8

7

7.8

6.3%

  1. 2012 DS RS: 2012 dry season reproductive stress, 2013 DS RS: 2013 dry season reproductive stress, 2012 DS NS: 2012 dry season non-stress, 2013 DS NS: 2013 dry season non-stress, DTF: days to flowering; PH: plant height; GY: grain yield; additive effect depicted as % of mean trial. The marker in Italics font style the markers closet to peak.