Skip to main content

Table 2 Statisticsof imprinted QTL with comparison-wise P -value < 0.05

From: Body composition and gene expression QTL mapping in mice reveals imprinting and interaction effects

   

Peakb

Flanking markersc

Estimated

 

Chr

Traita

Groups

(cM)

Left

Right

a

s.ea

d

s.ed

i

s.ei

% vare

6

lengthNA

pQTL

45

rs4226048

mCV24115224

0.1438

0.0361

0.0867

0.0609

-0.1492

0.0631

2.21

9

Edl

pQTL

1

rs13480071

rs13480109

-0.0008

0.0046

-0.0080

0.0064

0.0528

0.0114

2.27

10

lengthNA

pQTL

58

rs13480754

rs13480776

0.0679

0.0320

0.0693

0.0478

0.2329

0.0588

2.24

11

lengthNA

pQTL

23

rs6276300

rs6199956

0.1488

0.0350

0.0921

0.0561

-0.1188

0.0566

2.48

18

AI

pQTL

39

rs3670254

rs3718618

0.0406

0.0093

-0.0114

0.0141

0.0315

0.0156

2.42

18

Fat

pQTL

39

rs3670254

rs3718618

0.0411

0.0094

-0.0114

0.0142

0.0323

0.0157

2.36

  1. aTrait abbreviations are the same as in Table 1.
  2. bPeak position of QTL detected in Kosambi centimorgans.
  3. cFlanking markers (left and right) of the QTL peak. See Additional file 1: Table S6 for marker information.
  4. da: additive effect; s.ea: standard error of additive effect; d: dominance effect; s.ed: standard error of dominance effect; i: imprinting effect; s.ei: standard error of imprinting effect.
  5. e%var: percentage of phenotypic variance that a given QTL position can account for.
Back to article page

BMC Genomic Data

ISSN: 2730-6844

Contact us