Skip to main content

Table 2 Power of QTL identification

From: Multiple trait multiple interval mapping of quantitative trait loci from inbred line crosses

Analysis   SI SII SIII
(trait) QTL 1% 5% 10% 1% 5% 10% 1% 5% 10%
  Q1 66.8 82.0 86.6 65.8 80.2 84.2 67.6 77.2 79.6
MIM Q2 63.6 81.8 87.6 59.8 78.2 81.8
(T1) Q3 67.4 81.6 87.2 63.2 81.2 85.8 75.2 87.0 90.2
  Q4 66.4 81.8 87.0 63.4 78.4 83.4
  Q5 66.8 83.6 86.4 65.6 82.0 87.2 70.2 78.4 81.6
  Q1 64.8 80.0 88.2
MIM Q2 64.8 80.0 84.8 74.4 85.4 89.8 64.2 74.2 76.4
(T2) Q3 65.6 79.8 83.4 76.4 86.0 90.0 76.4 88.4 91.2
  Q4 66.0 82.4 87.0 77.4 87.6 92.0 74.6 86.0 88.0
  Q5 68.4 83.0 88.8
  Q1 65.6 81.4 86.0
MIM Q2 63.2 80.0 86.6
(T3) Q3 65.6 80.4 84.0 53.4 70.6 77.8
  Q4 65.4 80.8 87.8
  Q5 65.4 83.0 88.6
  Q1 98.8 99.4 99.4 53.8 71.0 78.2 65.4 65.2 70.0
MTMIM Q2 98.0 98.0 98.2 89.0 94.4 95.6 64.6 66.6 68.0
  Q3 97.0 97.4 97.4 96.6 97.0 97.2 94.4 96.4 97.0
  Q4 98.4 98.8 99.0 87.6 93.2 94.6 74.8 77.4 78.2
  Q5 98.6 98.6 98.6 57.2 71.8 78.4 65.6 66.2 68.0
  1. Power (%) of QTL identification in the MIM and MTMIM models as observed in scenarios SI, SII and SIII across genome-wide significance levels (1, 5, and 10%) and LOD-1.5 support interval.